Re: [Ace] Parameter abbreviation number ranges for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz

Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.seitz@ri.se> Tue, 28 August 2018 06:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED1C130DE9 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9SLCYRXgqM2Y for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out10.electric.net (smtp-out10.electric.net [185.38.180.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF867130DDB for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1fuXjp-000JNY-UX by out10a.electric.net with emc1-ok (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>) id 1fuXjp-000JSP-W6; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:44:29 -0700
Received: by emcmailer; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:44:29 -0700
Received: from [194.218.146.197] (helo=sp-mail-2.sp.se) by out10a.electric.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>) id 1fuXjp-000JNY-UX; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:44:29 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.166] (10.116.0.226) by sp-mail-2.sp.se (10.100.0.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:44:29 +0200
To: Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
CC: <ace@ietf.org>
References: <ed5a89e7-e2ed-8804-037f-8b50d2bc6d64@ri.se> <02f901d43e21$ca195e10$5e4c1a30$@augustcellars.com> <CAF2hCbZEkoRodXpE1kFF41fUWb6GoBVbtTnZuKPzRyVRhHhN=w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>
Message-ID: <f56d6586-6fb8-cf5c-28a6-b018fffca8ad@ri.se>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 08:44:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF2hCbZEkoRodXpE1kFF41fUWb6GoBVbtTnZuKPzRyVRhHhN=w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.116.0.226]
X-ClientProxiedBy: sp-mail-3.sp.se (10.100.0.163) To sp-mail-2.sp.se (10.100.0.162)
X-Outbound-IP: 194.218.146.197
X-Env-From: ludwig.seitz@ri.se
X-Proto: esmtps
X-Revdns:
X-HELO: sp-mail-2.sp.se
X-TLS: TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:128
X-Authenticated_ID:
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (c)
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (s)
X-PolicySMART: 14510320
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/P5BkZsj8S72LYRBJcUO9Vjs4jyM>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Parameter abbreviation number ranges for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 06:44:36 -0000

On 2018-08-27 18:39, Samuel Erdtman wrote:
> +1 on pushing up error_description and error_uri
> 
> I think client_id might be worth keeping low since it is often used even 
> when in combination with client_secret. See OAuth Mtls as an example.
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 at 18:20, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com 
> <mailto:ietf@augustcellars.com>> wrote:
> 

Note that the 1 byte range is 0-23

Currently in the 1 byte uint range we have 20-23 left unused

We could start assigning negative integer values in the 1 byte range if 
needed.


/Ludwig

-- 
Ludwig Seitz, PhD
Security Lab, RISE SICS
Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51