IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-14

Cigdem Sengul <cigdem.sengul@gmail.com> Wed, 09 March 2022 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cigdem.sengul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F5E3A1363; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:43:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KmjsGCikFk7R; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EFD3A1312; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:43:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id g21so4152590vsp.6; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:43:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0LMhdvQN7SxCGgRThNOYjhyyJgT2hh5005WDsxtDMdk=; b=DOiLspDgfIae0xkshGgSsumqlPnkCIWLbv41utcPtdTgqFVexb5gOtfAsHMMWGoi1n hKYJCCdeeAGtjmD+MP8Vux3WRn63xg2ZrPmIrGkho0v6N6GRMAp5ocjCuILWJfGUEARk jJUdK7vyU4Gjn4VNZGsZzKxeivs8kTsEKVtv6xESNsqNhC9IMb3n7PssnS67erkQKamQ IDXUU4yQityfHg8U7tP67uijMs4z4E5CrM4RnGRJW/R7tNRbQbostCAnNXuidUIVsJ6l tc7mcBCJ71AaGvHEwf0hlID8pQv7Yt8ivKE6dcmndDrSEQ8ywT5ErYUYREQu+5agevz6 ip5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0LMhdvQN7SxCGgRThNOYjhyyJgT2hh5005WDsxtDMdk=; b=XX+L88lI3WdXPaRE69KQlCUVe1stcs5iRBEDkQKFFXe8Z7S5b3gzllftxkr8wODo3S W58/2Zivp6lX56DqKmvtYKnmL8xsTeb4vLsig1+GvkHvt6x799BOYZRwriIQU8c0R30a fLW8DGwAzGgptxQemgkSAmNvMkY4VcBydZeY/OuhduqbueO6Ce2iZRYEzqoaxaBqJU45 T/R6ZkBeSbfvCoGf/CEJFfnhQ/nNpDNfytjZTQk7igargvxPtFDaQ+CGq0bW9Jv8IL/Q GTZbB6B0e6kHOBplWrRKR2T14ul90Mau6v3XDgcz2FnH+gDUiYtZ/q8z1FqU1Nad7nAt hs+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533CL6mKoQyl/gdxhspUL+fK/zHOQlmsvtnoD5O9HOdp+L27UkQ+ 15DsuDueyR0VLcLpdU1pmmyGyyoPCLsO3hrqx2Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgYEXpLoT6q8IwelKjQzToSAXIU+3oiqhQ9M3a4FQu3ns5y3EJW2IaMf4LQCkytqRCzqBeyOxp0h3yHQWaOYw=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:2f88:0:b0:31e:c163:ee53 with SMTP id v130-20020a672f88000000b0031ec163ee53mr1135201vsv.78.1646869423308; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:43:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164643005466.28393.1552756094187219874@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA7SwCOUHYJTpt-0JOVfwxZ1jgpDve87k2sSpxho=iS6q7Mgfg@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB42177EE2866E544D286A4AE9980A9@HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <20220309233944.GS22457@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20220309233944.GS22457@mit.edu>
From: Cigdem Sengul <cigdem.sengul@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 23:43:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAA7SwCNdKtsw23nidkWk8aOa7W=20aEzaNZV_5UQzWs2O4sxgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, Jean Mahoney <mahoney@nostrum.com>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7c47a05d9d1aa51"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/Q4niP_qPUoRNZoXy1qrhKeBVl8M>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-14
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 23:43:57 -0000

Fixed back in the new commit. Thank you! I wasn't sure how to react to
downref comment.

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 23:39, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:27:40PM +0000, Francesca Palombini wrote:
> >
> > Just one note: for the downref to informative documents (for those
> documents that were actually included in the text), please revert the
> change – RFC 6234 and RFC 8032 were correctly referenced as normative,
> since they are mandatory to implement. MQTT standards are also correctly
> referenced normatively. Jean was only noting these appear as downrefs, but
> downrefs are not “mistakes”, they just require more attention – see
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp97 for more information. Downrefs are
> usually Last Called to make sure the community is aware of them, except for
> those that have appeared as downref for many documents and don’t need to be
> Last Called explicitly anymore: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref/.
>
> Exactly so.  Thanks for the quick clarification, Francesca!
>
> -Ben
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email