IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ace] Re: [core] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-uri-path-abbrev-01.txt and renewal-info

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 27 September 2025 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ace@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ace@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B542B69E2226; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iV8v9oZqce6r; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59E1469E2207; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C5418010; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:32:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id eBwm_HQV8AS5; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1758994334; bh=eqx2NkGqrtBimH3XrFMDFSOcE/guf97t9ux7RxXzBNk=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=PBRyozimyjDUKacGDLVBYV+Pl/gDrZ7uLfawlpmML7tidiEEKk26Sd2C78HarwS3F ysL5ak/nLJWPTMOFKeqlkWGU45/iTlQcKl7QJMutqojO5poQKQ50AFqVgygCp5MH0M unvTL8cCptHucQ3TVuN+C85Y3wk6rgeg132BumFZnva24/ox5YbdWPVqGAwkvyAYcm j/NqQ9yBi2tE2TsyB3xsOk3ktmX06YIfQHCR9hh0Q+kHK3i2BJRn1UtUbPrp9+VXWZ SicIZy/3GrpxRgPmqwBliFfOA8oiGTeUtbqaOSHHKDpfResh3B6+ssde/I4t12fQo+ PuyHPpCrSrMbg==
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:b241:6fff:fe09:a92b]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631A11800F; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4261C0; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:32:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>, core@ietf.org, ace@ietf.org, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>, Mike Ounsworth <mike@ounsworth.ca>
In-Reply-To: <aNcmFX_as4zvohOf@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <175892923928.1872244.8058801630242481978@dt-datatracker-6c6cdf7f94-h6rnn> <aNcmFX_as4zvohOf@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:32:14 -0400
Message-ID: <23143.1758994334@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: B3VFTJA3WPMHNGADDHRRIEZPDESF2B4M
X-Message-ID-Hash: B3VFTJA3WPMHNGADDHRRIEZPDESF2B4M
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ace.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Ace] Re: [core] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-uri-path-abbrev-01.txt and renewal-info
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ace)" <ace.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/RVkfsQNCIX16R94gXZT8ozPJUR8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ace-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ace-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ace-leave@ietf.org>

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> wrote:
    > I think this is as compact as it gets, with all the options of
    > repetition deferred to future development (sketched in an appendix for
    > the benefit of future documents), it's really just a simple number.

Agreed.

Rifaat,MikeO and I have just posted draft-yusef-lamps-rfc7030-renewal-recommendation.
It replicates RFC9773 (an ACME thing) into EST/RFC7030.

It (renewal-info) probably should also update RFC9148 to add a new renewal-info for
EST-coaps.   So this would fit into the path-abbrev 30x space!
I think it will be fine for renewal-info to block on publication of abbrev.
Probably renewal-info should return CBOR for 9148 use, so we'll need to do CDDL.

So I'll include IANA Considerations in that document.

----

I think that renewal-info will have to resurrect the well-known/EST registry
that RFC8995 created as I-D, then walked back to make well-known/BRSKI
instead near the last minute...

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status