[Ace] Idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 30 November 2018 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFED9130E08 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 08:50:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91uuJNPwXJgW for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 08:50:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12C65130E02 for <ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 08:50:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id wAUGo5g0019078 for <ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:50:05 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu wAUGo5g0019078
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1543596605; bh=Scx2BCSPxKkECRixCgUgMsw0Uq7DeBXwPx+tWL8drro=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Q1Y7UXWuXDuHlIvD0NUej6YQAPS6KBoLsIvkcxfeNMSELdObbG8DdhNM0dZHoW08G 9adKs3kMrG6Ql+PgAd3PJinfMIPp9UImURVeX3EBJIUkhaq/0qxtNuv4weacXGp4Yn 1bXxWSjssUaAIuRD1yvejdF+ssG+ctZC8r+cWgH8=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id wAUGo3vf005772 for <ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:50:03 -0500
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:50:02 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
Thread-Index: AdSIy7+vhYiDadVqQGmJm7v2n5eOiA==
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:50:01 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0184C526B3@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/V7TsknbZU1YS_9xl5ezUnX5iJ4Q>
Subject: [Ace] Idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:50:11 -0000

Hi!

As part of the shepherd review, I ran idnits on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-05.  The following nits were found.  Could these please be fixed in a revised draft.

--[ snip ]--  

  Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest one
     being 1 character in excess of 72.

Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5226 (Obsoleted by RFC 8126)

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-17) exists of
     draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-16

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 7159
     (Obsoleted by RFC 8259)


     Summary: 2 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 2 comments (--).

--[ snip ]--

The line which exceeds 72 characters is in Section 3.4.  Specifically:

 /protected header / h'A1010A' /{ \alg\ 1:10 \AES-CCM-16-64-128\}/,

Regards,
Roman