Re: [Ace] Call for adoption draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01

Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org> Thu, 15 October 2020 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bergmann@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051A43A135B for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 01:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHMKOlFn_-WE for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 01:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11473A135C for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 01:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wangari.tzi.org (p508a4e5d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.138.78.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CBhtr0WjdzyWb; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:16:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org>
To: "Brockhaus\, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com>, Mohit Sahni <mohit06jan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Panos Kampanakis \(pkampana\)" <pkampana=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>, "stripathi\@paloaltonetworks.com" <stripathi@paloaltonetworks.com>, "saurabh.tripathi\@gmail.com" <saurabh.tripathi@gmail.com>, Mohit Sahni <msahni@paloaltonetworks.com>
References: <CAEpwuw09Ud-LBNhAc5591mbB+MpOOaeUKBEKfuRW5oJGCs5qZQ@mail.gmail.com> <BN7PR11MB254786CF6D99AF95C1EF0089C90C0@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <AM0PR10MB24183F163B988B1BE3B4B976FE0B0@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:16:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR10MB24183F163B988B1BE3B4B976FE0B0@AM0PR10MB2418.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (Hendrik Brockhaus's message of "Thu, 8 Oct 2020 06:07:50 +0000")
Message-ID: <87k0vrkipo.fsf@wangari>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/V9qSBqw4-Ry3g_hjhcIS6CWXMjo>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Call for adoption draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-01
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 08:16:09 -0000

Hi Hendrik and all,

"Brockhaus, Hendrik" <hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com> writes:

> The point here is, does the group support Mohits draft on specify CoAP
> transport for CMP.
>
>  
>
> Just to recap the discussion from IETF 108:

As draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile already is something a
working group in the IETF has decided to spend cycles on, the question
whether or not CMPv2 is something to work on already seems
decided. Given that, after a quick look at
draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport, I do not see a reason why not to
adopt this as well.

I was a bit surprised that you have selected the ACE working group for
this. One thing that might get in our way when doing this in ACE is the
emerging input for draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile. But
otherwise, I do not see a strong reason for not adopting
draft-msahni-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport.

Grüße
Olaf