Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-10.txt: Leaving implementers in the dark

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 18 February 2018 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB5B1241F5 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 08:45:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHnY0RfdFHyX for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 08:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 962FA1201F2 for <ace@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 08:45:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1IGjO9n001563; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:45:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.25.0.142] (rrcs-67-52-140-5.west.biz.rr.com [67.52.140.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3zkt6C2tdXzDXrX; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:45:23 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR0801MB2706F84DFA48E37BBED4C512FAC90@AM4PR0801MB2706.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 08:45:17 -0800
Cc: ace <ace@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 540665115.597488-c54b955e27ef2878894b5f8d61830291
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <05040BBB-5E6E-4569-8F8C-944CA04BBA3C@tzi.org>
References: <A5100B3E-DBA2-4FBF-9AE4-8E54CE161BCB@tzi.org> <AM4PR0801MB2706F84DFA48E37BBED4C512FAC90@AM4PR0801MB2706.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/WK6hCtJs0Ro1xroZKSf6TvXvWmE>
Subject: Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-10.txt: Leaving implementers in the dark
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 16:45:31 -0000

On Feb 18, 2018, at 08:35, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> We should maybe add that this information is provisioned either during manufacturing, via a commissioning tool or some other mechanisms. Not sure whether this will indeed add more but it might be useful to know.

For a protocol that is meant to be interoperable, there need to be standard (if not MTI) ways of getting this done.
At least we need to have a defined interface between CAM (“commissioning tool”) and C for letting C know what was agreed about how to address AS and which RSes it should be used for.

Grüße, Carsten