Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg

"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <> Mon, 21 November 2016 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8BB1294EA for <>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:33:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.017
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JD7UsrSrvvOq for <>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4CFD129696 for <>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:33:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=8044; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479742401; x=1480952001; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=SE5wI/aDe+kWxq3OVhJLBJcF8No16mVYhj2tqlnka08=; b=TflnVLBdrKrTm7Bqqx2VC7XBXjVbK1Gi1kDq/zu0T+RDhwZY/Rb/G8C9 ws73woz0jwHIKgiT10uYWWI7QC82WyYdF2ZahqYp/bKJ1LSpVpFKDIMck TE4XY4TaMEDrwFvSvO8mem04sWKgnmpQSAeZ0th8RrKg4Llk+8WnNT+zx 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,675,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="176066691"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2016 15:32:57 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uALFWvX7011581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:32:57 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:32:56 -0600
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:32:56 -0600
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <>
To: "Kumar, Sandeep" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: EST over CoAP in ACE wg
Thread-Index: AdJD/4dN3nkys8JpRuSDXvz8bQBVcAABV4QA
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:32:56 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0c8020c5de2042738704a6c8fc3d9778XCHALN010ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Shahid Raza <>, "''" <>
Subject: Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:33:24 -0000

+1 on ACE taking up this work.

From: Kumar, Sandeep []
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 9:00 AM
Cc: '' <>; Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) <>; Shahid Raza <>
Subject: EST over CoAP in ACE wg

Dear ACE members

Peter van Stok gave a short overview during the ACE f2f meeting on the work related to EST (RFC 7030) over DTLS secured CoAP (draft-vanderstok-core-coap-est-00<>). In the meeting there was general interest among the audience for the work and ACE as the preferred WG for this item. There are additional drafts and work on the same topic like the draft-pritikin-coap-bootstrap-01<> and the email from Shahid
The idea is to merge these into a single draft (already discussed among us).

We would like to get feedback on the mailing list if indeed ACE would be a right place to continue this work as was perceived during the f2f meeting. Please respond if you support (or not) the activity going forward in ACE wg.

Kind Regards

The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.