Re: [Ace] [IANA #1226120] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-aif (core-parameters)
Klaus Hartke <hartke@projectcool.de> Tue, 01 March 2022 10:51 UTC
Return-Path: <hartke@projectcool.de>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52D33A0113 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 02:51:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xBiNYvf2J-9 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 02:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp382.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp382.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8597::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD403A0100 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 02:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]); authenticated by wp382.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1nP062-0003G8-7O; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 11:51:10 +0100
Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id kt27so1542550ejb.0 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 02:51:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531anmR14g/qquhtAQlWK+vJmyjpOoyI7gdoT9/KXfW86vFAk1FY c+We9VpzJMEQfg3V2eX67zgxDKs4z4XYxitc1Os=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzefv9G45W0PY0COyZ0pBmR4S5r/kyeFrkE6WuDgSXwKFilrEoA5dC0pioTPgD5HcucK7qqAKi1UMYVNX5Jy7E=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6851:b0:6d6:dd9c:1b3b with SMTP id a17-20020a170906685100b006d6dd9c1b3bmr3581575ejs.120.1646131869969; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 02:51:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1226120@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-4335-1646067689-200.1226120-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-4010-1646068082-1878.1226120-37-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-4010-1646068082-1878.1226120-37-0@icann.org>
From: Klaus Hartke <hartke@projectcool.de>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 11:50:33 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAAzbHvZKd6pXJEYWZk4h49k+HCJoUX6tmS89wEKOm7ZG9e9X-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAzbHvZKd6pXJEYWZk4h49k+HCJoUX6tmS89wEKOm7ZG9e9X-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: drafts-expert-review@iana.org
Cc: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>, Jaime Jiménez <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>, Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; hartke@projectcool.de; 1646131874; 6e8dfc9f;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1nP062-0003G8-7O
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/XDER3OOo2faGQyLC5izH8FoaYoo>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [IANA #1226120] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-aif (core-parameters)
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 10:51:19 -0000
Hi Sabrina, I have reviewed Section 5.3 of draft-ietf-ace-aif-05 and the proposed registrations looks good to me. Since the draft doesn't request specific values for TBD1 and TBD2, I propose to assign IDs in the range 256-9999, such as 290 and 291. Small editorial nit: RFC 7252 defines the Content-Formats registry with columns "Media type", "Encoding", "ID", and "Reference". Since publication, it turned out that the columns should have been more appropriately labeled "Content Type", "Content Coding", "ID" and "Reference" (cf. [1]). Section 5.3 of draft-ietf-ace-aif-05 uses a mix of these two. (There is an unprocessed erratum [2] with the same mix, which however gets it wrong.) I'm not sure if the draft can deviate from RFC 7252 without a verified erratum; if it can, it should say "Content Type"/"Content Coding". Best regards, Klaus [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bormann-core-media-content-type-format-04 [2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4954 On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 at 18:08, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org> wrote: > > Dear Klaus (cc: ace WG), > > As the designated expert for the CoAP Content-Formats registry, can you review the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-ace-aif for us? Please see > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-aif/ > > If these are OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registrations at > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters > > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration reviews. The due date for this request is 14 March 2022. > > Carsten Bormann is also an expert for this registry, but he's the author of this document. > > thanks, > > Sabrina Tanamal > Lead IANA Services Specialist >
- [Ace] [IANA #1226120] expert review for draft-iet… Sabrina Tanamal via RT
- Re: [Ace] [IANA #1226120] expert review for draft… Klaus Hartke
- Re: [Ace] [IANA #1226120] expert review for draft… Carsten Bormann