Re: [Ace] Early media-type registration for EST over CoAP

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 17 May 2018 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F3F12E055 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2018 18:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FSz7OcC9_u2e for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2018 18:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C35E91241F5 for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 May 2018 18:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [209.171.88.177]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569561F906; Thu, 17 May 2018 01:39:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id D01CE137D; Thu, 17 May 2018 02:39:03 +0100 (BST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
cc: "ace\@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <VI1PR0801MB2112569A4E04F076D6B23F1EFA920@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR0801MB21122FFD4F19026259ABDF55FA930@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <30374.1526404823@localhost> <VI1PR0801MB2112C0B4E644A32082BA1257FA920@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <29971.1526472952@dooku.sandelman.ca> <VI1PR0801MB2112569A4E04F076D6B23F1EFA920@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> message dated "Wed, 16 May 2018 12:49:06 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 21:39:03 -0400
Message-ID: <31087.1526521143@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/YnTOAtyezCfxRgXuKNTFWR2Jctw>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Early media-type registration for EST over CoAP
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 01:39:30 -0000

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>; wrote:
    > I don't have a strong opinion about option #2 appears to be slightly
    > better.

Oh, I misread your options before.

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>; wrote:
    >> (RTT for the lookup vs extra bytes in the URL)
    >> Are you asking me about these two options:
    >> Option #1 - going through /.well-known/core
    >> REQ: GET /.well-known/core?rt=ace.est
    >> RES: 2.05 Content </est-root >; rt="ace.est"


    >> Option #2 - using a /.well-known/est URL
    >> REQ: GET /.well-known/est
    >> RES: 2.05 Content </est-root>; rt="ace.est"

Option 2 is not substituting /.well-known/core for /.well-known/est
(and doing resource discovery and then learn one uses /est-root/rv, etc.)
but rather not doing resource discovery, just go directly
to /.well-known/est/rv, which is what we do in RFC7030.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>;, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-