[Ace] Re: AIF extending models vs. composite scopes
Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> Mon, 22 July 2024 23:44 UTC
Return-Path: <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2073CC1D8777 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGiSLmplNxZ9 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.akis.at (smtp.akis.at [IPv6:2a02:b18:500:a515::f455]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381ABC16943F for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com ([IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bd]) by smtp.akis.at (8.17.2/8.17.2) with ESMTPS id 46MNi1oG035515 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 01:44:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from christian@amsuess.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: smtp.akis.at: Host [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bd] claimed to be poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com
Received: from poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (hermes.lan [10.13.13.254]) by poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3937F3F56F for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 01:44:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hephaistos.amsuess.com (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:7461:5b71:fae7:30eb]) by poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBC9F38962 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 01:44:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 10123 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 22 Jul 2024 23:44:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 01:44:00 +0200
From: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
To: ace@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Zp7uwNebj-Qp4I2F@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <ZoPuKZGorSXH00RZ@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uKrOSiiIvZq4KiKg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZoPuKZGorSXH00RZ@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.86
Message-ID-Hash: 3ID6IPKWTCVXENRINEFBCHIGXM4CJQAH
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3ID6IPKWTCVXENRINEFBCHIGXM4CJQAH
X-MailFrom: christian@amsuess.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ace.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Ace] Re: AIF extending models vs. composite scopes
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ace)" <ace.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/ai2fxo4-4HBhPcG4_NAIBDvmuJ4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ace-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ace-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ace-leave@ietf.org>
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:10:17PM +0200, Christian Amsüss wrote: > 1. Wrap the AIF and some indicators for the extra data in some kind of > "bag" structure. With how tokens spanning groups was described in today's session, there might be overlap for these items: let's see if the work coming up in draft-ietf-ace-group-oscore-profile solves this thread's issue as well. BR c -- To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers. -- Bene Gesserit axiom
- [Ace] Re: AIF extending models vs. composite scop… Christian Amsüss
- [Ace] AIF extending models vs. composite scopes Christian Amsüss