Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg
"Brian Weis (bew)" <bew@cisco.com> Tue, 22 November 2016 18:45 UTC
Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA45D129B16 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:45:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rdxy-XU6_4I7 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:45:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA39129B07 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:45:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11314; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479840353; x=1481049953; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ESxyoTDHGNDTclfEj5aeWmY7WVRbwPHUKsnwsAXY1BE=; b=bA/d0Xc4tLtUMRBrAfLkiM0awVgk8++Hi7r7bscTlOYgdHHNH0PMRlgG FRpB7G7lMicq+6/eEpS9MY+Y4SlBceKvQuqa3tQfIGY2Q2Frm4Oxml11i zIgtPeXnVXiPTxiVD08iUCkL8P/+atM8d/HF1nkunKVb7ESeIaOvD3ey8 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CnAQDckTRY/5hdJa1aAxoBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYJzRQEBAQEBH1iBAQeNOZcZj06FH4IGHQEKhXkCghk/FAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGkBAQQBAQFrCxACAQg/BycLFBEBAQQOBQmIZA6yL4tQAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIg7CIJVhBsQAgE8JoJqgjAFmk4BhkaKNoFxhHeJRI1mhAsBHjdeNB6FI3IBhn6BDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,682,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="351822241"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2016 18:45:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com (xch-rtp-010.cisco.com [64.101.220.150]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAMIjqBq032009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:45:52 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:45:51 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:45:51 -0500
From: "Brian Weis (bew)" <bew@cisco.com>
To: "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg
Thread-Index: AdJD/4dN3nkys8JpRuSDXvz8bQBVcABGwRAA
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:45:51 +0000
Message-ID: <A4D5E6D2-2496-4697-8F75-6E1DD39B709E@cisco.com>
References: <6525c5f0b6e040b683ccd9c43b1c5e2f@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
In-Reply-To: <6525c5f0b6e040b683ccd9c43b1c5e2f@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.41.33.249]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A4D5E6D2249646978F756E1DD39B709Eciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/cIPOrZSAM5cXGiq7Kg9YcTq7jGA>
Cc: Shahid Raza <shahid@sics.se>, "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>, "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:45:58 -0000
I support this work and it being done in ACE. Thanks, Brian On Nov 21, 2016, at 6:00 AM, Kumar, Sandeep <sandeep.kumar@philips.com<mailto:sandeep.kumar@philips.com>> wrote: Dear ACE members Peter van Stok gave a short overview during the ACE f2f meeting on the work related to EST (RFC 7030) over DTLS secured CoAP (draft-vanderstok-core-coap-est-00<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vanderstok-core-coap-est-00>). In the meeting there was general interest among the audience for the work and ACE as the preferred WG for this item. There are additional drafts and work on the same topic like the draft-pritikin-coap-bootstrap-01<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pritikin-coap-bootstrap-01> and the email from Shahidhttps://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ace/current/msg02029.html The idea is to merge these into a single draft (already discussed among us). We would like to get feedback on the mailing list if indeed ACE would be a right place to continue this work as was perceived during the f2f meeting. Please respond if you support (or not) the activity going forward in ACE wg. Kind Regards Sandeep ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org<mailto:Ace@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace -- Brian Weis Security, CSG, Cisco Systems Telephone: +1 408 526 4796 Email: bew@cisco.com<mailto:bew@cisco.com>
- [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Kumar, Sandeep
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Shahid Raza
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Brian Weis (bew)
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Martin Furuhed Nexus
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … peter van der Stok
- Re: [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE wg peter van der Stok
- Re: [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST over CoAP in ACE … Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [6tisch] [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoA… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST… Sandeep Kumar
- Re: [6tisch] [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST over CoA… Sandeep Kumar
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Sandeep Kumar
- Re: [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST over CoAP in ACE … Sandeep Kumar
- [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Liubing (Leo)
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? peter van der Stok
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory? Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] [Anima-bootstrap] EST over CoAP in ACE … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoAP in ACE … Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch-security] [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST… Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] EST over CoA… Michael Richardson