Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz -12

Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.seitz@ri.se> Mon, 25 June 2018 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB12B130E97 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v3807wL0zsO8 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out10.electric.net (smtp-out10.electric.net [185.38.180.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870941277C8 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1fXMon-000Hcx-UI by out10d.electric.net with emc1-ok (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>) id 1fXMon-000Heh-VK for ace@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:25:49 -0700
Received: by emcmailer; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:25:49 -0700
Received: from [194.218.146.197] (helo=sp-mail-2.sp.se) by out10d.electric.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>) id 1fXMon-000Hcx-UI for ace@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:25:49 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.166] (10.116.0.226) by sp-mail-2.sp.se (10.100.0.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:25:49 +0200
To: ace <ace@ietf.org>
References: <01c601d407f8$16621ec0$43265c40$@augustcellars.com> <CAF2hCbbe=r7eas82UwxLeE4rxonYc3scAS7UkV73h5bFPTSnhg@mail.gmail.com> <010501d40978$b3e609f0$1bb21dd0$@augustcellars.com> <CAF2hCbY1rgTwk=45ji3q0xVh9hxFROUXh47_DX0osj=g-ELjSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.seitz@ri.se>
Message-ID: <9f0ae26c-5b7f-b9d9-4ac7-3583236f5d17@ri.se>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:25:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF2hCbY1rgTwk=45ji3q0xVh9hxFROUXh47_DX0osj=g-ELjSA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.116.0.226]
X-ClientProxiedBy: sp-mail-2.sp.se (10.100.0.162) To sp-mail-2.sp.se (10.100.0.162)
X-Outbound-IP: 194.218.146.197
X-Env-From: ludwig.seitz@ri.se
X-Proto: esmtps
X-Revdns:
X-HELO: sp-mail-2.sp.se
X-TLS: TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:128
X-Authenticated_ID:
X-PolicySMART: 14510320
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (c)
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (s)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/efQ0NigVixKlQAPGC6oKwJO92cg>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz -12
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 08:25:55 -0000

 >         3.  In section 5.1 - There is a note in this section that does
 >         not seem to
 >         be extremely useful.  Where is this discussion go on?  Is it
 >         still going on?
 >         I am not even sure if the statement about a common understanding
 >         of time is
 >         correct?  It seems that one can either add or not add the nonce
 >         as an RS
 >         depending on if you think you understand a common time.


I agree, this seems like a leftover from when we discussed the issue of 
common understanding of time. I suggest we remove that paragraph.

/Ludwig
-- 
Ludwig Seitz, PhD
Security Lab, RISE SICS
Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51