Re: [Ace] ACE status
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 23 December 2021 16:12 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F27D3A0121
for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 08:12:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id C_h5h2I1kGR0 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 08:12:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de
[IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D094F3A0045
for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 08:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a436.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[80.137.164.54])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4JKZvp5WF0zDCcq;
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:12:06 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR0301MB24707D106AD9ACBC63076BB79E7E9@DB6PR0301MB2470.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:12:06 +0100
Cc: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>,
Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 661968726.362244-b565416d058922b0c000cd7c931fdbd5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A3D6113E-A389-47F2-8FA7-9C8DD857843E@tzi.org>
References: <CADZyTk=fGgTpNDAFgetJ-e4-hSYpi0buJR-m9vEbT5Gneec0GQ@mail.gmail.com>
<DB6PR0301MB24707D106AD9ACBC63076BB79E7E9@DB6PR0301MB2470.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.seitz@combitech.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/hc6xt48vmNty3GaBHoO7dY7E8DY>
Subject: Re: [Ace] ACE status
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments
\(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>,
<mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>,
<mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:12:18 -0000
On 2021-12-23, at 16:46, Ludwig Seitz <ludwig.seitz@combitech.com> wrote: > > Could you also give us an update on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz and the related profile drafts? > (I have only noticed they are sitting in the RFC-Editor’s queue for some time). I’m not Daniel, but these drafts are sitting in the RFC-Editor’s queue in a cluster: https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C442 The good news is that none of the drafts in this cluster has a MISSREF, so we are not waiting for anything. The other good news is that the drafts have already passed the EDIT stage and are now in RFC-EDITOR stage. The somewhat more low-key news is that quite a few drafts are in that stage, as this requires a review of the work done in EDIT; we are 3.4 weeks into that stage, while other drafts (including monsters such as C430) have 6 weeks or more and aren’t done yet. So I would expect we’ll get into AUTH48 state in January. How long we need to get that done depends foremost on the responsiveness of the authors. With luck, we’ll be published in February, but if there is a show-stopper, we might miss IETF 113. Grüße, Carsten
- [Ace] ACE status Daniel Migault
- Re: [Ace] ACE status Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] ACE status Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Ace] ACE status Daniel Migault
- Re: [Ace] ACE status Daniel Migault