[Ace] ace-key-groupcomm-oscore-03
Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> Tue, 19 November 2019 09:12 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4579A120096 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:12:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bbhmail.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3aJkfHyiiiuU for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:12:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0047.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E3901200A3 for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:12:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898FA3A9B for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:12:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbhmail.nl; h= mime-version:content-type:date:from:to:subject:reply-to :message-id; s=key; bh=hPIZVJzknCUEMtoHQJnSqCmHUqT5m0LR/SUNnWemp DA=; b=Y2gQDk8gdkPs2ux1PfZMX/r/Le9YkFMqaQPqqh2ftGjqsLtwc5vbRpsjq nm/xEyWkVSuRZzhgYwtdKAjo77BOPfYn40eRbteWUAiXMtysCihPPQKysuHq2Jlh TrD2Camxe3myjT4A8sbwijAb7j4R/S/EvwEwem/ipRl10umaWY=
X-Session-Marker: 73746F6B636F6E73406262686D61696C2E6E6C
X-Spam-Summary: 50, 0, 0, , d41d8cd98f00b204, stokcons@bbhmail.nl, :, RULES_HIT:41:72:152:355:379:582:800:962:967:973:983:988:989:1152:1189:1208:1221:1260:1263:1313:1314:1345:1381:1431:1436:1437:1516:1517:1518:1534:1541:1575:1588:1589:1592:1594:1711:1730:1776:1792:2198:2199:2525:2561:2564:2682:2685:2693:2829:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4250:4321:4362:4557:4659:5007:6119:6261:6298:6659:7464:7903:8603:9010:9015:9025:9177:10004:10400:10848:11026:11658:11914:12043:12114:12555:12679:12895:12986:13071:13139:13161:13199:13229:13846:14096:14180:14181:14721:21060:21063:21080:21324:21433:21451:21625:21691:21740:30048:30054:30070, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:0, DNSBL:none, Custom_rules:0:0:0, LFtime:3, LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: hen77_6c2b7e5268700
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4062
Received: from mail.bbhmail.nl (imap-ext [216.40.42.5]) (Authenticated sender: webmail@stokcons@bbhmail.nl) by omf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ace@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:12:23 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_7066c21d67827bd53dcce5340c7b1edf"
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:12:22 +0100
From: Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
To: Ace <ace@ietf.org>
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4-rc2
Message-ID: <4ac02bb82ae9a67ad93c4ffe34063f19@bbhmail.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
X-Originating-IP: [5.206.216.229]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/jN-IUwl_skLG4tEIzj6roYoWY_Y>
Subject: [Ace] ace-key-groupcomm-oscore-03
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:12:29 -0000
Hi Authors, Having read the document and comparing it with ace-key-groupcomm, I have to agree with Jim that this document repeats in "other" words the same subjects as specified in ace-key-groupcomm. In this form, it is very difficult to find out the differences between the two documents. It would be good if the same terminology was used or their equivalence was pointed out: eg: Client vs joining node Group-manager versus KDC joining request versus joining authorization Secondly, I suggest to make this draft much shorter, and mostly refer to the sections of ace-key-groupcomm and point out the differences. In many cases a list of items that MUST be present, are optional or not present at all will suffice. For example such an enumeration is done under the bullet key on page 15. New parameters can receive more text as is done for cs_alg, cs_params, cs_key_params, and cs_key_enc. Hope this helps, Thanks for all your work, greetings, Peter -- Peter van der Stok vanderstok consultancy mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org, stokcons@bbhmail.nl www: www.vanderstok.org [1] tel NL: +31(0)492474673 F: +33(0)966015248 Links: ------ [1] http://www.vanderstok.org
- [Ace] ace-key-groupcomm-oscore-03 Peter van der Stok
- Re: [Ace] ace-key-groupcomm-oscore-03 Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Ace] ace-key-groupcomm-oscore-03 Marco Tiloca