Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreements
Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Fri, 09 September 2016 19:44 UTC
Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D1912B31E for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2qA4BhxXg9R for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7729712B1B8 for <ace@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 12:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.233]) by resqmta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id iRiobNlcgHqoliRipbI2Bz; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:44:23 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1473450263; bh=l99agh8L5d8PAVNDh9blpCoT998V24zjfJLWh9igoyI=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=nYTyaJd6/KX0bP2qRHF4cxnFvekuxkjXMC2GdRcPkgwmcwqtIwguUdxsWv4gRHQ2d v6d8GnxpFw1eG6uW7IwbKwXZWSr8pKDIAHt9n5iWb4ohY6n9NSgKNhkeiu8Qy35nGn CBq2VJEOP8B1fiaD4f3ukkNYgXoq1MQhNFf9ZdNcpo8l5653jIb6YbyCD6RuzqvBqy bOOfXuM9xt68hsP5FZzEKkzc+txVTh0qdw+/focogUn58io1uRAkDVfzzP9By0FUxM QOKWfuIFX0zTfCxwfFrKct78zYrHmkQ6ZNUBZvLodZB9UL8sU6lK+weZd2D4Hzu4uY nwSm3g39ObO4g==
Received: from [IPv6:2601:148:c000:1951:706d:c8d9:732d:7bd7] ([IPv6:2601:148:c000:1951:706d:c8d9:732d:7bd7]) by resomta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id iRinbx7NtsFLXiRiobY1K2; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:44:22 +0000
References: <57909032.10809@gmx.net> <6d259c5b-28e3-c748-4590-0c9f942fe343@comcast.net> <378a0359-6b31-a30c-af28-8ea567b06b00@cisco.com> <57963480.2000809@gmx.net> <0d4c6d56-ebb5-2f43-d555-29c336396033@ericsson.com> <15169.1469642303@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAHbuEH4u=AF1LSoDq+YfLwt+VX1OOrj54331GuZmyjLswHvNnw@mail.gmail.com> <3271.1469656595@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <32aa7104-70df-80c7-8d6e-537b66716de9@comcast.net> <13663.1469714549@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <9a4153f1-6a96-0ae6-020b-0f0f966aecdf@cisco.com>
To: "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <95997f84-2715-3287-39d3-45d6ff5f3ea0@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:44:21 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9a4153f1-6a96-0ae6-020b-0f0f966aecdf@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBw0JUnugRjmQDYxZhz/q4QhDHOo3PJQnrImOgY/I6y6UkUUkeP7dp9HROGsge9JlK0HZ9BVYjExQZEsOSUl5aCCxt+bBGg/QdJMhHdjqRvpOOrBAjiB WRYwpBmatoICRzaGvGRkyl7EOKdZ+xAo/ly0qXxCAdi3WnlP4PspG2jQXLlCD4V4JNkGZl1rcMxb6g==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/jayrVVXg2BJIDlIOFaV5hgGkyY4>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreements
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 19:44:24 -0000
Hi - It's been over a month since there's been any further discussion on this topic. Given the record I would suggest a lack of consensus to proceed on basis of two items: 1) A roughly even split on the vocal yays and nays on the subject of symmetric key multicast for control functions and 2) a failure to address the specific concern of "How do you enforceably keep a cheap, unsafe-in-the-broader-internet security mechanism off the broader internet?" Your mileage may vary. Mike
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Mohit Sethi
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Mohit Sethi
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Derek Atkins
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Michael StJohns
- [Ace] (on signature verification times) Re: Group… Rene Struik
- [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreements Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Derek Atkins
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Paul Duffy
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Grunwald, Markus
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Ludwig Seitz
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Somaraju Abhinav
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ace] Group Communication Security Disagreeme… Michael StJohns