Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)

[Seitz Ludwig <[e-mail]>]

Hello Zahed,

If it's ok with you I'll fix that in conjunction with the IETF-editor review (they will probably find a few more like this).

/Ludwig

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>
> Sent: den 26 mars 2021 15:04
> To: Seitz Ludwig <[e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-
> ace-oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Thanks for the update. My comments are addressed now.
> 
> Found a nit : It is RECOMMENDED that an AS reject a request
>       containing a symmetric key value in the 'req_cnf' field
>       (kty=Symmetric), since the AS is expected to be able to generate
>       better symmetric keys than a constrained client. client (Note: this does
>       not apply to key identifiers referencing a symmetric key).
> 
> s/reject/rejects
> 
> BR
> Zahed
> 
> 
> On 2021-03-26, 08:17, "iesg on behalf of Seitz Ludwig" <iesg-
> [e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>     Hello Zaheduzzaman,
> 
>     Thank you for your review. The issues you found are now fixed in version -
> 14.
> 
>     Note that there seems to be an problem with xml2rfc, since the outdated
> reference to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33 should have been taken care of
> by the tooling.
>     I have notified the maintainer of xml2rfc and fixed the draft manually.
> 
>     /Ludwig
> 
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
>     > Sent: den 24 mars 2021 10:31
>     > To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
>     > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
>     > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-
> ace-
>     > oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)
>     >
>     > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
>     > draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: No Objection
>     >
>     > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
>     > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory
>     > paragraph, however.)
>     >
>     >
>     > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> criteria.html
>     > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>     >
>     >
>     > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>     > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params/
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > COMMENT:
>     > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     > * Section 1:
>     >    Nit : s/Respresentation/Representation
>     >
>     > * Section 3.1:
>     >   I have similar observation as Martin Duke, and the resolution suggested
> by
>     >   author looks fine with me as long as the cases are distinguishable.
>     >
>     > * Section 12:
>     >    Refers to draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33, -38 version is available now.
>     >
>     >
>