Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)

Seitz Ludwig <ludwig.seitz@combitech.se> Fri, 26 March 2021 07:21 UTC

From: Seitz Ludwig <ludwig.seitz@combitech.se>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org>, "ace-chairs@ietf.org" <ace-chairs@ietf.org>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHXIWeLlDBFClOjfE+d6HMje3HX7KqV3j2A
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:21:32 +0000
Message-ID: <8bf1e9c79de041b59eadea5def6a27aa@combitech.se>
References: <161667063695.12472.4970875424542156689@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161667063695.12472.4970875424542156689@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-SE, sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/lJH6C3U7nnwwXO7FjKDV_Y29MDQ>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Hello Lars,

Thank you for your review. Your issues have been fixed in -14.


/Ludwig

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Sent: den 25 mars 2021 12:11
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org; ace-chairs@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-
> params-13: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> All comments below are very minor change suggestions that you may choose
> to incorporate in some way (or ignore), as you see fit. There is no need to let
> me know what you did with these suggestions.
> 
> Paragraph 1, nit:
> Elwyn Davies' Gen-ART review
> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Yauw_b5iNrPx-
> nQ095FyFKmQxlM/)
> contained some nits that I wanted to make sure you were aware of.
> 
> Section 12.1, paragraph 1, nit:
> >    [I-D.ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession]
> >               Jones, M., Seitz, L., Selander, G., Erdtman, S., and H.
> >               Tschofenig, "Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for CBOR
> >               Web Tokens (CWTs)", draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-
> >               possession-11 (work in progress), October 2019.
> 
> Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession has been
> published as RFC 8747
> 
> Section 12.1, paragraph 2, nit:
> >    [I-D.ietf-oauth-mtls]
> >               Campbell, B., Bradley, J., Sakimura, N., and T.
> >               Lodderstedt, "OAuth 2.0 Mutual-TLS Client Authentication
> >               and Certificate-Bound Access Tokens", draft-ietf-oauth-
> >               mtls-17 (work in progress), August 2019.
> >
> 
> Outdated reference: draft-ietf-oauth-mtls has been published as RFC 8705
> 
> Section 12.1, paragraph 4, nit:
> >    [RFC7049]  Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object
> >               Representation (CBOR)", RFC 7049, DOI 10.17487/RFC7049,
> >               October 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7049>.
> 
> Obsolete normative reference: RFC 7049 (Obsoleted by RFC 8949)
> 
> Section 1, paragraph 3, nit:
> -    Respresentation (CBOR) [RFC7049], JSON [RFC8259] MAY be used as an
> -      -
> +    Representation (CBOR) [RFC7049], JSON [RFC8259] MAY be used as an
> 
>

[Ace] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-ac… Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Lars Eggert's No Objection o… Seitz Ludwig