Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-coap-est - optimization for embedded devices

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 24 January 2019 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905A9130F12 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:01:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T9h2j7hi5euv for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:01:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E8E130F0F for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:01:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4DB38266; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:00:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 50461262D; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:01:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDD123DB; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:01:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
cc: "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DB6P190MB0054743FDD8DB32669C5BB23FD990@DB6P190MB0054.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <DB6P190MB0054743FDD8DB32669C5BB23FD990@DB6P190MB0054.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:01:01 -0500
Message-ID: <23266.1548345661@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/lRRHS4C65cEwJtXBV45KbmQ7CXw>
Subject: Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-coap-est - optimization for embedded devices
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:01:03 -0000

Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
    > So to reduce code size for embedded implementations it would be very
    > beneficial if the EST Server would support an additional content
    > format:
    > application/pkix-cert  (see RFC 5280)

So, to implement this in the specification, we need an additional
Content-Type value to be allocated.

If we have WG Consensus to add this, then we can spin the document and ask
for another early allocation.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-