IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-bormann-core-ace-aif

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 16 July 2020 06:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFB43A0F7C for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t2l6jqVt9dVv for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7D33A0F7B for <ace@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.116] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B6kkk4fJMzyvB; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 08:25:02 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <010101d65ae9$bdffb520$39ff1f60$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 08:25:02 +0200
Cc: ace@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 616573501.852074-ef3dedd3545eff061458becdde372b47
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D66C4FDD-A1BF-4408-A6DA-562EE2E777E9@tzi.org>
References: <010101d65ae9$bdffb520$39ff1f60$@augustcellars.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/msajYQyDnxfv4-qBhun1Xn-Toh0>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-bormann-core-ace-aif
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 06:25:28 -0000

On 2020-07-15, at 22:51, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> 
> I had been holding off doing an adoption call waiting for a formal request
> to adopt it.  

Sorry about that — I was still thinking we should finish the discussion about the new dynamic permissions.  But I realize now that these have been around for a month and that they really are not that relevant for the adoption questions.

> However, given that this is now a dependency for three
> different WG documents I think we need to do this now.

Great.  Since I didn’t ask to initiate the call, I can reply to it!

It seems this draft is becoming a useful little shared component for other work, so we indeed should adopt it.

(And while everyone else is rereading -09 to see whether we should adopt it — do you have any opinion on the new dynamic permissions?)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email