IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-41

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Mon, 24 May 2021 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4923A34B7; Mon, 24 May 2021 13:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spAKJiYTfnJq; Mon, 24 May 2021 13:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82E483A34B6; Mon, 24 May 2021 13:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id d14so31816702ybe.3; Mon, 24 May 2021 13:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TeqAQxtMuhmMC7C1dPP7ZpdtYQ1Xs7B69tzaUUGVXxs=; b=osW+FjcLsjYb5T3qHRKMNirNrXYFmtwQqvvedW98DTHaipYSL9LDIUJ+fB6N7ROpzE 6k3GMS6OXGEsVJAeHojl933AFi7vCGR+WbCRMvAcdcXZZbDGoU4mp37q5jpjrf+rQZgM qYiQWVkiBHx7pITNyH2DriQ7KrZ/D7lF7D04hahmMzu8OXPLDVnKGlOfYBqaLl1Vq7hE SrOyw5S273ghkcCH6TKFy1jfvbAfm+/Az3qQiHZ93vzx+l6+PmjDdRZid4ONUI41VMV6 JnwM8A3ojdPQuO/3c0+AFFR2/5RIcJlfbLWySgAkPuxzkbAvwpPb1NU1ug1QyePWKF90 lQvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TeqAQxtMuhmMC7C1dPP7ZpdtYQ1Xs7B69tzaUUGVXxs=; b=LDBQZ7BTNHpaOXnRok2T98Y+qsHuTPXszmY7JlZL/PZE4zjp/lyFlhMG3EXmUV37Z9 /cKea+i8nyWBmG/W9/n6sH4scmWIj6P+/I5gJD2WZ7qMHaYYcxMeTp7OVXTW3Gv7ZE/1 RN6eZ7NncpoqCOcYQO3oBHWZDRbZHEvyDVOugCOP7+v3imtk76Q+Mak/xOVyU2hWU0YQ PsPUIJ8BB+VpFi56T3lmdWvPa/52q9f9hMHXXjjE2RhrxfzV+tP6vMAGtHG2Vr+NRJSs hF4XHG77PO86/ivGIfBWcAhVR2sH4U855dvutrKUJ/3P0IUgwZdw7QGAIf7jQZw+wlgA UbOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rulK1b8Cn6XKG6D7aHwwI91ySj6yr8VWNyVAigXD80CobdMdF qT82ZSneD2x7JUdiVAXahVeIBjMHoPpbh6EIGE8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcTz6sdmAOCNMeqhOw1fHfaknR7J40hmwNANO19E/SyLJifaVaOOPwMdu4XIHVKOLiImyfIOBBIk9bmVSgeV8=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:7745:: with SMTP id s66mr18188084ybc.302.1621887207934; Mon, 24 May 2021 13:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162164047967.4459.16040288658397288714@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADZyTkmNf=m5Pz4qz8ANn-JBbcuLuK56QAwrtbFz+bsj_qfAHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkmNf=m5Pz4qz8ANn-JBbcuLuK56QAwrtbFz+bsj_qfAHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 16:13:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwj9Avd_2n6Bd6=k0ww=aGynG+jvDHcTM2U5pOzuD6Q8hQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz.all@ietf.org, Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e510f005c3190a35"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/pNBLCfDzkaB6VnFq056GvzO5JAM>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-41
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 20:13:35 -0000

I am strongly minded to suggest a spinning plates model of security.

Remember the vaudeville act with plates spinning on a stick, the performer
gets one, two, five, ten going. And each time he adds a plate they have to
go back to give one of the plates he started earlier another push.

Well... I think this is at the very limit of the number of plates I can
spin.




On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:57 PM Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Phillip for the review.
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:41 PM Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker
>> Review result: Ready
>>
>> This draft was previously reviewed by Steve Kent for the -27 version. My
>> review
>> therefore mostly consists of checking that the changes recommended have
>> been
>> made and that no new issues have arisen. Note that contrary to the data
>> in the
>> tracker, I was not given the assignment in 2019.
>>
>> If you decide that you want to use OAUTH for authorization security for
>> Internet of Things, this is a reasonable approach to take. This is not a
>> simple
>> proposition or for the fainthearted. OAuth is built around the various
>> constraints of the browser world to which the constraints of being a
>> constrained device are added.
>>
>> The issues raised by Steve have all been addressed as far as I can see. It
>> looks good to go but since it is a security spec, ADs should still take
>> note.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ace mailing list
>> Ace@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Migault
> Ericsson
>


-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email