Re: [Ace] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Thu, 08 March 2018 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F5B126C26; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:58:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22eTFTjKgTio; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0126.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC51126C19; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:58:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=gyF4GyZI4KSzavl0UHOWYDFyUvgpnZ23H9cf6AIR6GY=; b=meUtXFCFQvON8zdn9YtlB+DSaoEFH20w7f6zH1FUZC7oUMJh7PTjO84a0+j0FC9VDcWV7ID6RE2UU+irZLkReBAGFrL4ndCDf0pQfpYjKJVU0PQ4hve6efSPLF1JqE0BXGYN64KMIIBzXas8VVtX5h1S3jBwtYGGrApenr+vmQM=
Received: from SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (52.132.114.20) by SN6PR2101MB1053.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (52.132.115.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.588.3; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 06:58:32 +0000
Received: from SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9866:f6b5:e2d6:50]) by SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9866:f6b5:e2d6:50%2]) with mapi id 15.20.0588.008; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 06:58:32 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org>, "ace-chairs@ietf.org" <ace-chairs@ietf.org>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTtnEvK2OssFOs2U+GLb0WT/+1z6PFvb+AgAAV27CAAAyugIAACFoA
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 06:58:32 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR2101MB09435BEE3E3DBDE003482295F5DF0@SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <152046753224.21454.8592401400498503627.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180308042415.GA27850@mit.edu> <SN6PR2101MB094361203E6C9741F2511A7EF5DF0@SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <81651717-66f6-d373-3264-a8af228ec85b@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <81651717-66f6-d373-3264-a8af228ec85b@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [50.47.88.236]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN6PR2101MB1053; 7:d2g9zSSbQWSqqUzBjMBoydYvYTZuQB6o0lL7epW2m5uAtnz+P2SxJQQeHQh9yQTEX5npI/fl6cgGrUEKIDX7qrTSdmBJl9qcseGkP5HLSXFOXem8GG+IFgWl5kE1Gf1GjsgsKUUjPKcukkKjmT8S8qZmPVvgRGxJbftXp1GRPKgP+Md5Uyp/omNCJGRlgYYHl0kfZrOzJaXkPITBWpUNvvkr9cTuSYLbLvGi+NOGHe8Ivt/UntYA32Wgz7EqPa5/; 20:oX5meUNLKGF/JXwRob822utty7h4a11ltEVlauieJ2IkCpWn54bxjvv5PWyDGJsChIm0QCDk8EEriTLHE9WE9Zkdh6gwHRC+8so+pTeyIYRrFTivZo669U3JCIepiknldEXNcImCg/jxLDMWJ2CdoTHuW8TRIPdp1CgZaXLkh64=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8cf62f42-71b9-46cd-de56-08d584c20179
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR2101MB1053;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR2101MB1053:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR2101MB1053D049AFBD68A4D007E2BFF5DF0@SN6PR2101MB1053.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(89211679590171)(240460790083961);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(61425038)(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(3231220)(944501244)(52105095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041288)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:SN6PR2101MB1053; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN6PR2101MB1053;
x-forefront-prvs: 060503E79B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(366004)(39380400002)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(68736007)(8936002)(76176011)(8990500004)(7696005)(3280700002)(53936002)(9686003)(86612001)(305945005)(22452003)(4326008)(7736002)(106356001)(6436002)(14454004)(186003)(86362001)(2900100001)(478600001)(99286004)(229853002)(10290500003)(55016002)(93886005)(33656002)(81166006)(2950100002)(81156014)(5660300001)(97736004)(2906002)(66066001)(6246003)(25786009)(2171002)(316002)(8676002)(105586002)(5250100002)(26005)(74316002)(6116002)(72206003)(3846002)(10090500001)(53546011)(54906003)(6506007)(3660700001)(102836004)(110136005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR2101MB1053; H:SN6PR2101MB0943.namprd21.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tygA5AT/lQeG8Vc0485NkLOUuPOvFVjGMZcuRAMaA6mVHjo/w948VNaRnTOo4cbXQV+JRzSPwjNJ8A1ARdT91prvQ5DsMNHQCp5e1RXZ7nzbmFztdOhBC9tchVULu2OpLw5y4A1t/yQJUu7txqzjFtGLWg69IhHLBgIVwqhBrf/MqrgJLefE7fQqxXEkXzmcbMeYLXyAszvJM/g5gR1C0NIlTL02blht4R/o4frEpD5jRcozGwHcdbkkCtfQgdZbo802HX+KwejOI4AkKYpWUvOJdRgsy3kqRY+3Er0iaQY0uWL6I+cJX/yEB6AlgVNV1IKGcemms3pBdPDdpR55Kg==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8cf62f42-71b9-46cd-de56-08d584c20179
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Mar 2018 06:58:32.4758 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR2101MB1053
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/qqmm_C_GG1-jxYPDF2GMGogAurU>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 06:58:37 -0000

Fair enough.  I'll work on alternate exposition for these types to avoid any potential confusion.

				Thanks again,
				-- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 10:28 PM
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>; Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token@ietf.org; ace-chairs@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: (with COMMENT)

On 3/7/18 11:47 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> The point of including new CWT definitions for "StringOrURI" and "NumericDate" was so that we could use them directly.  Prefixing them with "CWT" isn't necessary for the meaning to be clear in context.


Given that the current formulation confused both Benjamin and me, I think this assertion doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

/a