Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 15 March 2018 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11AB12D941 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 02:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.435
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgZC3vMfOUtC for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 02:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8337312D893 for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 02:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [81.128.173.187]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D86D41F969; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:37:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id F1FA021FD; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 04:00:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ace@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <d716e4e92bcd44b891469a7f6a92598d@xs4all.nl>
References: <001d01d3b8b4$f6e71600$e4b54200$@augustcellars.com> <e426d5786082bdc863fbe6a5960c112b@xs4all.nl> <24297.1520991636@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <d716e4e92bcd44b891469a7f6a92598d@xs4all.nl>
Comments: In-reply-to peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> message dated "Wed, 14 Mar 2018 09:18:42 +0100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 08:00:57 +0000
Message-ID: <25902.1521100857@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/vbL1HZdc3JQsNRQsGIHSGRpdS8E>
Subject: Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:37:05 -0000

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> wrote:
    >> >> DTLS connection is going to be required to act as an RA.  RAs
    >> are required
    >> >> to have the entire request for adding authentication as necessary.
    >>
    >> > This is visible in the figure of section 6, but needs elaboration in
    >> the
    >> > text.
    >>
    >> I don't understand why we have that paragraph.
    >> An end point that terminates the Pledge (D)TLS connection and acts as
    >> an RA *IS* a Join Registrar, not a Proxy.
    >>

    > Thus is outside the BRSKI context, and thus a proxy with RA (separate or not)

Let me delete "Join" from above sentence.

A device that terminates the DTLS security (CoAPS) and then talks to the CA
is a Registration Authority according to EST and RFC5280.  It's not a proxy.
(And it doesn't matter if it speaks HTTPS or CMS or CMP or super-pigeon-telepathy
to the CA)

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [




--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-