Re: [Ace] Use of /crt vs /crts in draft-ietf-ace-coap-est
"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 14:32 UTC
Return-Path: <pkampana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBDC120026 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=EU31VqIz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=EpQ7k6UI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x1UeeAJlIGNK for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3191E120098 for <ace@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6234; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1558017161; x=1559226761; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=vUNRKGNBsSxWsRmOZXZDSAah4hf+XDc0UNTbhWcMTuo=; b=EU31VqIzz5ZUZ/csEk1YGpMiCTuTjvQgCqjgUJ/U67j5PVkJHlOl35X3 +WhKmfAbOhFEpaFaR8F+9MO2dCEJBmWVHXS4XOY78HRQjl3vMQZ9+Fw5Q NdhANLkelHr2lOTL3ohC9P3UGzbZAw1reeYaurKQ8gjUKGfcwx6fDEkCw s=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:H7p6CxbgCZCx10OECfpWk53/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20gabRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNMn1NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8KavybCU/BM1EXXdu/mqwNg5eH8OtL1A=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BIAACTc91c/4YNJK1kHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBUQcBAQsBgQ4vUANpVSAECygKhAeDRwOEUooiSoINkliETYEuFIEQA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYRAAheCFyM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEEbRwMhUoBAQEEEhEKEwEBOA8CAQgRBAEBKAMCAgIwFAkIAQEEARIIGoMBgR1NAx0BoEsCgTWIX3GBL4J5AQEFhQAYgg8JgTMBi04XgUA/gVeCTD6EDAUBEgEhNIJUMoImjWCEU5UqCQKCCZJ5lW6MNJUKAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFPOGZxcBWDJ4IPg2+KU3KBKY0DgSIBgSABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,477,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="271458905"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 16 May 2019 14:32:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4GEWdRN010147 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 May 2019 14:32:39 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:32:38 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:32:38 -0500
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 May 2019 10:32:38 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vUNRKGNBsSxWsRmOZXZDSAah4hf+XDc0UNTbhWcMTuo=; b=EpQ7k6UIjupcZYCTb2Fv20uXl/+5m5wrBmCJqjHSAFRdoOsYPKskIzUzTtBncbN759/bPxttizi10cOmEHtpRkj7KhuS5PePdaaC4JFzWk+mVFWg9OCawlqIT3f1cW0JWStf2c6i4S2exYgrZjwz4Zyy7kwauyjhlNxgOZ5czYg=
Received: from MWHPR11MB1838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.175.53.141) by MWHPR11MB1919.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.175.54.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1900.16; Thu, 16 May 2019 14:32:36 +0000
Received: from MWHPR11MB1838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4964:5495:9121:8f12]) by MWHPR11MB1838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4964:5495:9121:8f12%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1900.010; Thu, 16 May 2019 14:32:36 +0000
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Use of /crt vs /crts in draft-ietf-ace-coap-est
Thread-Index: AdULyUVDHrMZ/hgzRrmoVKEKwnTIhgAKn7aQ
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 14:32:36 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB18386C234C68BED90B08385FC90A0@MWHPR11MB1838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB6P190MB00545053A023C1E9632E5D28FD0A0@DB6P190MB0054.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <DB6P190MB00545053A023C1E9632E5D28FD0A0@DB6P190MB0054.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pkampana@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.94]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 10f5ec26-2718-412b-a927-08d6da0b577b
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR11MB1919;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB1919:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR11MB19198F55490E9EFA6E21D592C90A0@MWHPR11MB1919.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6430;
x-forefront-prvs: 0039C6E5C5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(366004)(136003)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(229853002)(71190400001)(4744005)(2906002)(11346002)(64756008)(52536014)(3846002)(6116002)(790700001)(6436002)(186003)(486006)(53546011)(99286004)(6506007)(66476007)(55016002)(446003)(71200400001)(86362001)(5660300002)(102836004)(476003)(66556008)(66446008)(26005)(66946007)(73956011)(76116006)(76176011)(25786009)(7696005)(110136005)(14454004)(6246003)(478600001)(66066001)(256004)(2501003)(316002)(74316002)(8676002)(53936002)(9686003)(6306002)(54896002)(236005)(8936002)(81166006)(81156014)(68736007)(33656002)(7736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR11MB1919; H:MWHPR11MB1838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Tnn+Djoux6nvmQMNEglizHLi2gF2YEEsiMHW9J7DjFG4VD1+EH3DMjaix3YjT50Zip2/xLxPbL68kU+8Gcj6Jvr4plCIT8MzjED7i659LdjeU/MG9mqIwkUllUcsVMiXCkWaNZCVehWhnxNhcfpqIfGEs0SXtGZlv/5tjN/HdVIdUyFzMLXsUqjeN9tiLcLTX3plWznQZoDRIYcjX1odbWc6VeKLGJdeyWaIuia3uXtGT9faBV16plDPD9ehhp9dz+UmTPWE+ES7UqeNPykqLw5NqIVmknEmhIV8HqhcF2RFeBygnesthLNnjFNfIJB9DB027EJf+ceDdADHd11pK2kDMOS5UaEpCSkR1LDj+ho3YNyY2WylAnECBXsS3AUfKYdtXqH7kZkfz88IXLbE886KvVwrbM3ZsGZPiNn/Fmo=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MWHPR11MB18386C234C68BED90B08385FC90A0MWHPR11MB1838namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 10f5ec26-2718-412b-a927-08d6da0b577b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 May 2019 14:32:36.5260 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB1919
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/voy0Xc8aaACEW23zXnu9UO48CLY>
Subject: Re: [Ace] Use of /crt vs /crts in draft-ietf-ace-coap-est
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 14:32:43 -0000
Good catch Esko. Thanks. We had three leftover “/crt” that should have been “/crts”. Will be fixed in the iteration to be submitted tomorrow. From: Ace <ace-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Esko Dijk Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 5:28 AM To: ace@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-coap-est@ietf.org Subject: [Ace] Use of /crt vs /crts in draft-ietf-ace-coap-est Dear authors, In the draft both the paths /crt and /crts are used – this appears to be incorrect. Should it /crts always ? Best regards Esko Esko Dijk IoT Consultancy | Email/Skype: esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl<mailto:esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
- [Ace] Use of /crt vs /crts in draft-ietf-ace-coap… Esko Dijk
- Re: [Ace] Use of /crt vs /crts in draft-ietf-ace-… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)