[Ace] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-14: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Loganaden Velvindron for addressing my DISCUSS and thanks to Dan for
addressing my COMMENTs (kept below for archiving).

The whole email thread is at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/WYJryqoMGfUjbCVFOUztAtzKUiE/

# COMMENTS (non-blocking)

## Section 3.1

Where is `Step 0` defined ? I.e., refer to section 3.2.

The text is too assertive about the use of mDNS & DHCPv6 as these protocols
cannot currently be used for the discovery (i.e., no option is defined for
DHCPv6).

## Section 3.2

Who is `we` ? The authors ? The WG ? The IETF ? Suggest using the passive voice.

## Section 7.1

Is CoAP always over IPv6, i.e., does it always run over 6LO, RFC 7252 seems to
allow CoAP over IPv4 ? Else `CoAP goes on top of UDP/TCP, which provides a
checksum mechanism over its payload` is not correct as UDP over IPv4 can have
no check-sum.

# NITS (non-blocking / cosmetic)

## Use of SVG graphics

Please consider using the aasvg tool to have nice graphics ;-)