Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession?
Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Mon, 07 May 2018 16:37 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DF61270A0 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2018 09:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QtptY6Fcu4lw for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2018 09:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02on0132.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.36.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC9B3120726 for <ace@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2018 09:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=pAILN/Qr3uOjfENQELCC3leGuyyDsVW/PJ4TzDhFOXQ=; b=ApiC6R+Jl80N2wefrcGCH+YgLwM72Nc/mkxaogCqS6FVekSXKIW3kzWLLjFrzGdC1KPe6YXWqgaOt5H2ICPbNsxNxY30AybQgaTxhKDlXJINITQY1q/6/sa5TUpPKoyfJLqL5XrIzazNuECUnYKfDU6kcFIZx2LKtji1z7S5ObY=
Received: from BL0PR00MB0292.namprd00.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:207:1e::30) by BL0PR00MB0291.namprd00.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:207:1e::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.789.0; Mon, 7 May 2018 16:37:24 +0000
Received: from BL0PR00MB0292.namprd00.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::84a0:cb3c:39ec:1b01]) by BL0PR00MB0292.namprd00.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::84a0:cb3c:39ec:1b01%5]) with mapi id 15.20.0788.000; Mon, 7 May 2018 16:37:24 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
CC: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se>, "goran.selander@ericsson.com" <goran.selander@ericsson.com>, "erik@wahlstromstekniska.se" <erik@wahlstromstekniska.se>, Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession?
Thread-Index: AdPiXgA1LeUMmV1IS8++EEL31dH27QDwySFg
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 16:37:24 +0000
Message-ID: <BL0PR00MB0292D77AFB4325CF781FE60BF59B0@BL0PR00MB0292.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BL0PR00MB0292B63DC13F98E05C0EC50DF5800@BL0PR00MB0292.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR00MB0292B63DC13F98E05C0EC50DF5800@BL0PR00MB0292.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [50.47.80.188]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BL0PR00MB0291; 7:7kmgNsJHJSq+MTJfjxW/MBUBpX7CDmLfJWzvgrXm2ZfukVtWBHJj8TOhERnPce7O//sZSsXQy/PUL/vbGdx+P4YYCi3T8i9Jh8AhmOaXNWf8fg91cNxJpbcMFrcprRJYUBqEWf5KhSEcbsHB8ApjxlxY7wHQ1fXLIJIG15FK2I9nIUMXjo7XyYxKN3KQPnG7xJdJQaWkAZHNpebiUG94ZtSokKXjKGmD01Q/vRUzZawszMOO6wt+wPCwQMRIm7nU; 20:pvZTzHaKv2NTmqBZsbHkMGLSiGHqX98n+6gDO0yFeNvKce8xNsogMDf7EqwORhbv/ElU0FAzeajIlNuap1H8BnyU+HTCCdhT1BW4E6KtqM9TYq80lERJzGJHGaAgZAV28Hd9C2UUCBhcAQc0LX/MCMPpFwryfwvHlhV9qx43Tmc=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BL0PR00MB0291;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL0PR00MB0291:
x-ld-processed: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BL0PR00MB029119CFE9BBB0B1533E5163F59B0@BL0PR00MB0291.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322)(28532068793085)(180628864354917)(120809045254105)(21748063052155)(240460790083961);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(2017102700009)(2017102701064)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(2017102702064)(20171027021009)(20171027022009)(20171027023009)(20171027024009)(20171027025009)(20171027026009)(2017102703076)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231254)(2018427008)(944501410)(52105095)(10201501046)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BL0PR00MB0291; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BL0PR00MB0291;
x-forefront-prvs: 066517B35B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(39380400002)(376002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(106356001)(10090500001)(229853002)(68736007)(76176011)(5250100002)(6306002)(86362001)(8990500004)(186003)(606006)(105586002)(74316002)(66066001)(6436002)(14454004)(102836004)(6346003)(3846002)(97736004)(790700001)(22452003)(6116002)(6506007)(55016002)(25786009)(53546011)(3280700002)(52396003)(9686003)(10290500003)(7696005)(4326008)(86612001)(3660700001)(316002)(54896002)(5660300001)(478600001)(236005)(966005)(8676002)(8936002)(33656002)(2900100001)(110136005)(54906003)(11346002)(2906002)(486006)(72206003)(413944005)(476003)(99286004)(26005)(6246003)(81156014)(81166006)(446003)(7736002)(53936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BL0PR00MB0291; H:BL0PR00MB0292.namprd00.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: LTW5ChTC8RGkeK5H5tPpP9tyrtMDkT69+j+CgOyET/TkAI0ehqVoxLvnT/60W36INmyELHauk3gIoBejw1ryjjbzCH0XyD0NsgSPODVia53KhfE5NJ3aifwjEJwhCf8OP02N7bG+SCNEgSHyIQ9f1FEchDtIPaltsZiiG3eX0QiJQuYfL4KquqmUnqnt7gQN
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BL0PR00MB0292D77AFB4325CF781FE60BF59B0BL0PR00MB0292namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 5d757f60-3b83-4d86-8c4a-08d5b438d009
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5d757f60-3b83-4d86-8c4a-08d5b438d009
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 May 2018 16:37:24.1946 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR00MB0291
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/i2KCDhcfjKFPa3PL8a8nfZPhf6c>
Subject: Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession?
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 16:37:36 -0000
Dear ACE chairs,
I never heard back on this. Given that CWT is in AUTH48 as RFC-to-be 8392, I believe it's time to start WGLC on draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession.
Thanks,
-- Mike
From: Mike Jones
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 2:45 PM
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>; Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: Ludwig Seitz <ludwig@sics.se>; goran.selander@ericsson.com; erik@wahlstromstekniska.se; Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>; Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>; Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession?
The ACE minutes from London https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-ace-00 record that the editors thought that draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession was ready for working group last call. I haven't seen any further discussion of the draft on the mailing list since then, making me think that the working group agrees with this conclusion. Especially given that draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token is in the RFC Editor Queue (in the Edit state), it seems like it's probably time to move CWT PoP along as well.
Do the chairs agree, and if so what are the next steps? (For that matter, if the chairs don't agree, what are the next steps? ;-) )
Thanks all,
-- Mike