[Ace] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-08: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Joerg Ott for the TSVART
review.

My review did not surface transport protocol related issues.However - can we
define/refer/describe "diff queries" in this document? The meaning might be
very obvious to the experts but describing it will improve the readablity of
this specification and avoid misconceptions.