Re: [Acme] IP addresses

Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Wed, 25 March 2015 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B541A9162 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rxX7ZsMECO68 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986491A9149 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=96uqc2zusRdnbNRaMPUIb6BYrI5D5W42jaCBE2+3P3c=; b=jEDKbSS6ixqA+fjK9J1Lzi63vSJyEwN+gSONZmMO61Ypn1IDvbEFIbIVvNk4PoXwUKp+qMOeSxeAVj7G7LKdrVcJuyIA2/SgWGKJZXrX1zQHB4/kCUzE9KH1VYw/f59NaQJL9GzmiAaNt8BQuF4s2FLEFNEKv3FfJzNxn7ecPEc=;
Received: ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:48:11 -0700
Message-ID: <5512F4DB.5090805@eff.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:48:11 -0700
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>, acme@ietf.org
References: <m31tkdgp7w.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
In-Reply-To: <m31tkdgp7w.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: skipped for local relay
Received-SPF: skipped for local relay
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/0rtON9qvHZUChxwVvXZqTc7Kowk>
Subject: Re: [Acme] IP addresses
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:48:14 -0000

On 03/25/2015 06:51 AM, James Cloos wrote:
> Will acme support CSRs with not just dns names in subjectAltNames, but
> also ip addresses?  Verifying that the dns name(s) resolve to the ip
> address(es) is reasonable in such cases.
This is more a question of policy for the implementing CA than a
protocol question, though validating IP addresses might require a new
type of challenge response.