IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Sun, 12 March 2017 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA917129491 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kmG0UDEkNCoJ for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 757BD129519 for <acme@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v203so4834667wmg.0 for <acme@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WnwrE5xR2x6PSRuuzXyouriMtNDM9xolzeLMi0D0aNc=; b=vYYma0v0ejZ+m21PG9yyYIzoLUwpfDQs3EvXCFtpr6VNLgSR1DMA8ddbNhndNj5G+D 9m/SfvNvXzu00MnPNORUivEYfBVCP/AGfyBmiRm1VYCQ17BVDcR+9uZgJoPHlEOXb7bZ t43c6B82AFlgpzKTy3xCyKneDtDe6iz82EH2F4F2NFoA2FHy1aQ2dn7K5AMSvKKrINwr 5bJSOMGkVG6M1jYP+XqyEY2WEKeZ/BJH86l+GMwxTYDMMOOES4kxDWqqY6F31OO7vveT nc+xEiPaD7MAQ6f64ARjzT39WSVnEQ8/B9k1TlYmjk1feK2t2OrOYOhVUY8Ij5+29vdT FG/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WnwrE5xR2x6PSRuuzXyouriMtNDM9xolzeLMi0D0aNc=; b=dqS24JdJJK+u5lkEH78sbUM2npoQmctaSL3Pl1is0Y2mra9dx3Q9rt6jD0WBy3D56Y DFYDlhJX+5qSWbvPXrEFu4PVYWNHreP36wB9Y4ShJb1G+zOprud+eo+ckkwdWZt6p8of got3hNT5dsUtWhQljuzcPFfIrkOYDKfb8V+jOgcaR7mTdKPWxhb6+kCy3ReG710PeX2S vYk869H9uJafp5K+V+y+s0zKseT2auFJT/lWKQS7zLg3Fh/ELzxS38s0rs1sHC2gZWC+ zndQFLIZRm4hWIFz4un7tWzkObY809hEsU4C4XL8IMEPsmFZUEUCzR2aoULzB57bosDX zzcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2AFDeyub8TzTyyLiNlkirEehNDl1C+rxw5Yph+H54E49suAC8YV/HhxCpn+s77B/a2XyuxJ7p/8vP6aA==
X-Received: by 10.28.156.69 with SMTP id f66mr6577747wme.56.1489333994405; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.31.2 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <73bf64eceade46f896da9ad077ccc0bf@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAMmAzE+yqFXWVcgHmBGaGR21sx0a0-VUBogoFLxFcrvoFrwkYw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnV5T-eXmb3b+e67tVqBZSDH6=Zrg2fbENh-ggQA5oU3wQ@mail.gmail.com> <73bf64eceade46f896da9ad077ccc0bf@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:53:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQbBxjggdJo1PuKbeW+qh2qc5FtinHGBoeM39xCRM5OLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b7e2ab05867054a8a97b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/4giYG83_BTRqczl9h9CGS2hcv-8>
Cc: Logan Widick <logan.widick@gmail.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:53:18 -0000

+1

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> > I would rather see new challenges defined with a new hash function than
> > introduce orthogonal hash negotiation.
>
> Speaking as an individual, I strongly agree with this.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email