Re: [Acme] ACME BoF in Dallas -- call for agenda items, issues, speakers

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 12 February 2015 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30661A1BBC for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:08:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48_JzF0tRVti for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5429F1A1BA4 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by labgq15 with SMTP id gq15so12198101lab.6 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:08:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8/XmeMH8nAkuY9t1VSppUD//oQa7YcMsOr7QNpziyq4=; b=lEsS9SaaxaRhwwm9p6mgCJyTpwwo2xSMxHVVZjzDnrS6+DGaJOIcUbPIFbyI0Sa0ps a9z67CtbXHFt0US+dU4HS7M3BrqCHTz9TusXh7GG62CkeBMdRn3HOwItrCbl/N3U1KOa W2fVgHX3EKJ69HIh0+IqE9bpqyAeZXkg06Ka2+Ikw8lsjSdfb6ivZ/0ykgBJpniYepx4 v5sZ/u4k/ioL5IhnwmzvWa810f7CXKlEfpxskmW6AFrqqLuKYNuRflPM3UdIMsIo0n1l zCEUJ2mWW3X6xSHrdXRu7kguPHpQtTMyrmMTyzW7p+C8CJTJB8ZYT9Ut7uoA8hKHAkPw tBww==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnEIkrI8r9dZ0bqRThytpbZxjP2uGTrfevuux5gWzT0EdwBlUw8GjJ0zHnQkQVH2sBl0Ztq
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.146.167 with SMTP id td7mr4806545lbb.68.1423768111497; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.133.2 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:08:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <bee6e93c6ea94b7cbb7ed32db177f421@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <bee6e93c6ea94b7cbb7ed32db177f421@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:08:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL02cgT17dXRh9pgWvegWrsDqOSTcxVJWVSyUSyXFTsk1noRsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b342c9e875954050ee8d82e
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/5QBAHvxjfqLqHgTrJ3Jw9uhx-9g>
Cc: "Ted Hardie \(ted.ietf@gmail.com\)" <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] ACME BoF in Dallas -- call for agenda items, issues, speakers
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:08:36 -0000

I would be happy to give an overview of draft-barnes-acme-*, and some of
the design rationales for what's in there.

It would be good to have some input form other folks who have designed and
deployed cert automation stuff, e.g., CAs and hosting/server/CDN operators.

In terms of goals for the BoF, it wouldn't be unreasonable to try to get
some agreement around scope -- what certificate management are we trying to
automate, what's missing in existing RFCs, and what solutions have people
come up with already?

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

>  Our BoF for the Dallas IETF next month was approved. The chairs are Ted
> Hardie (on cc) and myself. Remote access will be available via jabber and
> meetecho.
>
>  As Stephen said, this is a non-WG-forming BoF, but it’s quite likely
> that the WG will form before we have a chance to hold another BoF.
>
>
>
> This note is to solicit agenda topics, open issues, people who want to
> make a presentation, and so on.  We only have an hour, so presentations
> will likely be short and the bulk of the time will be open mic and
> capturing issues.
>
>
>
> And if anyone is in an early mood to volunteer to take notes, I’ll buy you
> a beverage after the BoF J
>
>
>
> --
>
> Principal Security Engineer, Akamai Technologies
>
> IM: rsalz@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
>