Re: [Acme] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Considerations about ACME BoF

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Sat, 28 March 2015 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0E01A8983 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fyfrv3qv9Qax for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869311A8706 for <acme@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (ool-6c3a0662.static.optonline.net [108.58.6.98]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 157F1F984; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 15:34:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4D26D2027E; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 14:34:11 -0500 (CDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5516B43F.2000806@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <551569F6.8020507@openca.org> <551570AA.7080001@cs.tcd.ie> <CABkgnnV0QCsHihGyb2qLYBUL+9s908VKG-ZaE8FwDHrgOpYrbg@mail.gmail.com> <5516B43F.2000806@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 15:34:11 -0400
Message-ID: <87fv8oudak.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/5Uu86cXwwQzk9GBcQOTcgnxPHhU>
Cc: Massimiliano Pala <director@openca.org>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Considerations about ACME BoF
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:34:21 -0000

On Sat 2015-03-28 10:01:35 -0400, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> On 28/03/15 04:57, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> 2015-03-27 10:00 GMT-05:00 Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>ie>:
>>> DXrxwlJ+snHskMXl7T3Q8QBoKukLeHVHE5MP/vyHWU6pjsOu5QeG79Rz/RHxIK/0
>>> /1N/W2vSwIHvsuf1a963x7lcATxqOEILq7rrewlBQqWce/qpjw2DMEs3hSwRtnMc
>>> epUY3EzVMHPgH0ccpruWCBKcdmGn9Bil4eRHtw/tYLv88OE/KU/T2fbcvAapnoxC
>>> /cZkicXkBanYnq0b4FoNIWwhT4/XhVIWGH4mFb8qPdy0TgRP8t7+E5FBRT7o8SuT
>>> Wk55oWgYyH36oe85vbaQyVQgxKMpNOQLmTPgMOKsU1RB0f10YxbOKmfdxrfpjVdb
>> 
>> 
>> It's good to see that you are enthusiastic about encryption
>> everywhere.  I personally hope that we don't lose sight of the
>> secondary goal of usability in the quest for better security.
>
> Yep, nicely ironic. But see my next mail where I apologized for
> whatever enigmail bug caused that. (And here's hoping it doesn't
> affect this;-)

I believe that bug was introduced in enigmail 1.8 and resolved in 1.8.1,
fwiw.  Please contact me off-list (or on enigmail-users@enigmail.net) if
you're still having this problem with a version that is not 1.8.

       --dkg