IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] AD Review: draft-ietf-acme-caa-05

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 03 January 2019 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E431312A9 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:33:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HyYGVjr69Hx6 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57E11312A0 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x03JRQux004109; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 19:33:15 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=KYjXDUkivEYOO0hBNWeEWc3ywIfK0dh0KEcGun/pLgg=; b=LSWRl37cJVYgFCQRx0JmdFuO8JE1SD15wh9z8k23RcePO7vn27UEjFSiGxqXx+LimR1Y MalK+0uBKFl36axZDK+flKq9ROfcbklXVYNKVsIiG058wf57LZQZsS9IWDxU99SwnfGx Y+WarisA0j2UGqisJWHlcH1tQu3x5hdBO95L3msjXNcQJn7XaAdWQqoNUJrpqByx3GjL Da232TB5r9EkhIKoCI9WflFd31vLmYCIy7JK/nLy8b2+bUNYRhX5n9q4BLmrqibfgtO1 FhbFgunGZuOdxSjZD/oJ7VXblL6EcuTSUMxb8hE7optFGAn0ejeGHEVM2kfKAQTMvVdk 8g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a96-6-114-86.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2prvp34b4t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:33:15 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id x03JWPCD001753; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 14:33:14 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.27.21]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2pp552uwp9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Jan 2019 14:33:13 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 13:33:13 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 13:33:13 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Hugo Landau <hlandau@devever.net>
CC: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, "ekr@rtfm.com" <ekr@rtfm.com>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] AD Review: draft-ietf-acme-caa-05
Thread-Index: AQHUi3jLfP8Y/vLkOUqA08X1v1zwkqWJ4XcAgAGS2wCAABAKgP//yn4AgAo2aoD//8BRgIAAVcMAgAiUzQA=
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:33:12 +0000
Message-ID: <7F104233-0DAA-4D16-87B2-E4B191853A2F@akamai.com>
References: <CABcZeBMoHaDGEgQXmM2qdGi=i0mXxPsuKdiq3jtAKTojVOAG_A@mail.gmail.com> <20181204022641.GA29286@axminster> <CABcZeBOBSWysCEJXJ+rD6mG4=QgMyuo77giNm5NuWJKrxZMK1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20181222162816.GA23425@axminster> <CABcZeBOPs2AFMo8RYgoSP7zHOtNcoV0681e_r8yhTPdxgYhTCg@mail.gmail.com> <19FFB15F-3B01-49C7-A9BE-863BE159A40A@akamai.com> <20181229021131.GA25012@axminster> <45C0FFD1-D3EE-4B28-8062-520A9AC13456@akamai.com> <20181229033032.GA25199@axminster>
In-Reply-To: <20181229033032.GA25199@axminster>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.14.0.181208
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.68]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3BC010FD299C6E43A66C607A52086409@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-01-03_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=517 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901030169
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-01-03_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=514 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901030169
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/5zhkQA0hgWoWi3bZuaB5qQV3PYM>
Subject: Re: [Acme] AD Review: draft-ietf-acme-caa-05
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:33:23 -0000

@ekr, is this okay with you?

On 12/28/18, 10:30 PM, "Hugo Landau" <hlandau@devever.net> wrote:

    On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 03:23:35AM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
    > 
    >     +   Validation methods beginning with the prefix "ca-" are reserved for CA-local
    >     +   meaning and may not be registered.
    > 
    > "need not be" ?  Or "SHOULD NOT be" ?
    My intention was that the rules of the registry state that such names
    MUST NOT be registered. I didn't use a capitalised keyword here for
    consistency with the prose already in that section.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email