[Acme] acme-integrations cmcRA
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 21 May 2021 18:40 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF593A1AE0 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PYuZ7NiyUBx5 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264083A1ADC for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0703B38D51 for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:49:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GrciUx-gL9kY for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:49:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF7A38D50 for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:49:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BD59AF for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 14:40:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: acme@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:40:04 -0400
Message-ID: <1072.1621622404@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/9rWhrSIgD1Q1h9dl3hdbM78N7-s>
Subject: [Acme] acme-integrations cmcRA
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 18:40:14 -0000
I am listening to the ACME recording from 110 (missed it due to conflicts, I think it is my last video to watch) At 38:00, discussion about cmcRA bit issue. Russ asks a question about the bit. Owen says it is about communicating with the MASA. I don't think that the MASA cares (at least, I don't recall writing anything that says that). It is the Pledge that cares that the cmcRA bit is set on the thing it is talking to over the provisional TLS connection. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [Acme] acme-integrations cmcRA Michael Richardson