[Acme] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-integrations-13: (with COMMENT)

[Warren Kumari via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-acme-integrations-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-integrations/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm balloting No Objection in the "This is outside my area of expertise" / "I
read the protocol action, and I trust the sponsoring AD so have no problem"
sense of the term. I've been called for jury duty, and so am relying heavily on
Bo Wu's OpsDir
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-acme-integrations-12-opsdir-lc-wu-2023-01-20/)
and Ted Lemon's DNSDIR
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-acme-integrations-13-dnsdir-telechat-lemon-2023-03-01/)
reviews to help guide me. Thank you very much, Bo and Ted.

While Ted does say that "at this point that the concerns I raised have been
addressed and the document is ready to go", I'd strongly encourage the authors
to reconsider addressing the comments in the first two paragraphs of his
review; I think that they would further improve the document...