Re: [Acme] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-acme-star-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 03 October 2019 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB0A1200E6; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vyX3ADqUcgor; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEF391200A4; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x93HgH4v005859; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 18:51:11 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=2ijLMUJZ31T2KRWejUmInaqTZieacVsJgP1ThhzoJhE=; b=cy6eGVWXRcgDZsfX1SXE+4vrPRctn8DPwv8qDMm2sohcxNliyOSS6BtbrrygnHjF7nyP ry3c/v6+bks7NpIZFDRCHoCUHJcnHLaCrzjVulwHEy2CqXlsY4NYDTcAQn+p2NMia2MB 7N+aOKajuRqPdm2LgPaTXxYGIvl6Lif6vCAa0EeE9jEL++BvVBSXro9on4QpB+3hIpqu /dAZQFqxfRoSNZaaiw69BvUr9TzRxdJmuToOh6/+3oztdnTowInTSh8OcCKgYc8Iv7MC eZ9i1dSsI6A9D5wrJrY1eOHdtLVsIbrs8ILjNm5tZFV/p2AYxll/Kc68Y77rQI+cGPsd zw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v9xs8m2wd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:51:11 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x93HliTh025566; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:51:09 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2va2uxa7ck-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:51:09 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:51:08 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:51:08 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
CC: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-acme-star@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-acme-star@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "acme-chairs@ietf.org" <acme-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-acme-star-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVduMTAjsueVSdDESN/TugPUmY4adDRlwAgADpqwCAAAURAIAFPwCA///EZgA=
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 17:51:08 +0000
Message-ID: <59A1FA1D-E76A-4F33-8025-B838BB53BDF6@akamai.com>
References: <156977456805.21721.14788916437504551807.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E43AE79C-3733-414D-B97B-19D4860F1246@arm.com> <878853E5-2BDD-4609-B6B0-50F6A01FF9B2@fastmail.fm> <08DC6EC0-9D4A-43FB-A2E3-C55BD722F1C3@arm.com> <20191003172427.GV6424@kduck.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20191003172427.GV6424@kduck.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.88]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <58F027EA39F1C64984FD9F03993B2C27@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-03_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=800 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910030149
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-10-03_07:2019-10-03,2019-10-03 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=778 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1910030149
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/G3DBVdYmFMSI_j2_LRtIr2w1VB8>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-acme-star-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 17:51:20 -0000

    > Rich, Yoav: would that work for you?
    
    Note that "Specification Required" also implies expert review; please
    consider giving some guidance to the experts as to when they should
    approve/reject a registration request.

Yes, but I'd want to explicitly make sure that the WG thinks this is okay, by giving a week for review once it's settled down.