IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] IP addresses

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Wed, 25 March 2015 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D281A89C7 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IyU5WUOkX28Q for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [IPv6:2604:2880::b24d:a297]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C0FE1A1AC9 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id CF19E1EC3B; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:27:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore14; t=1427311640; bh=4XTfNzlrYg1OkBlrJXJW3+A88Tqa8yRwVHZx59vIbwg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=cUTzhxhgz3Gc5k0jGuPJlfo0GSbKB1l4ivqo8LrgY0MfgR1zNktsQSInWYmJK0OQS by/sEf+ML42paKn5MXojhq9srLmTyJqKzdf76h0UkPoXqYFpR0lWuYOLV7zITIKCyV coXN5wm+3qjDruWkG+xbbvdpOzim+sQsykat5BSQ=
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 425B4106FC0A2; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:24:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgS1d1WHy3JVUaaWeG1UgWg_CP0vFnFfozrst-9Aomwiow@mail.gmail.com> (Richard Barnes's message of "Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:17:18 -0500")
References: <m31tkdgp7w.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <5512F4DB.5090805@eff.org> <CAL02cgS1d1WHy3JVUaaWeG1UgWg_CP0vFnFfozrst-9Aomwiow@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2015 James Cloos
OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:24:29 -0400
Message-ID: <m3egocg9si.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Hashcash: 1:28:150325:rlb@ipv.sx::pjxfrjJvtTsO6VGM:000000gQy7E
X-Hashcash: 1:28:150325:jsha@eff.org::vVBu/+NE+4sZi4jH:00005/Czq
X-Hashcash: 1:28:150325:"acme\@ietf.org"::uPSYGJPRptMPeS88:2E0sM
X-Hashcash: 1:28:150325:acme@ietf.org::5acK8MQLG15BgooT:000GvWsf
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/LVK4G7gfJkJD6D7P_IpbQAfq7QQ>
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] IP addresses
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:27:24 -0000

>>>>> "RB" == Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> writes:

RB> Automated validation of IP addresses seems pretty fraught to me.
RB> You need to verify not only that the applicant controls the IP
RB> address in question, but also that he will continue to control
RB> it for some period of time

Ok, yes.  It would have to be for static assignments only, and that is
difficult.

Would a >> name >-a/aaaa-> address >-ptr-> same_name << trip be enough?

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email