Re: [Acme] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6321)

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Tue, 27 October 2020 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28203A1558 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QXMUUqreRPS3 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D158E3A154F for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id k9so2448487qki.6 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KHm8xXzmJQCUB8YB31Ht8HgmS27peEchzdJ7epRUt+4=; b=thX5ZjwLQ888qb2L/62/17YLBonVH6+AmIuqIT2D3XFQCBBsG2sR5/GBMRe2gUmtvV KmYRYl1LzphhhM6wHE2iQt+Tm/K9UTXEkarOgrFAUtlui1Y+GJHcBbjM6Il5x5u9JuJ9 ENLHo6JupBzjn+eNlfAGLoPi6mB5HvVXTdLc6fqNmhHNFzU73lbdXVSFNmQ9eO6zxv2A lDrt9gES13IUXeqaJt9UWljI9DPKlc6O6na0ep4hiYmJZpnH39yJSnBLkYhsCxWLHtEs HhFGbbuTKC8oDO9nC5l5l6+ajbEKY3SQxA43IF1SXesBEH4axQc/6WOS+YLIst2P27eF befA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KHm8xXzmJQCUB8YB31Ht8HgmS27peEchzdJ7epRUt+4=; b=cj4DzQFUhh/GkdSvIoJrQrgTrlTwmmAsofWiX7ezIkEkXcyJouBB5mWtMUZBj/R3Fk m/ja0fVIdgD+wOsz29HUPBzl679E7CYSOJ5aqYBfKj/Tu394StLcKniKpQsduSAYcCPt WixTcms5ekrB+Aa3BIYhnMrrtAZSLKr6swV9PXRA6bZThkW9y3rSDu7u8NufKf1Hmk4x 0RGDhb4ZS64cWvGazok85Q0v6EOtKkrWlvhzoBPBF/gENtWAshUgdazm7Xgck8URYUzc VG+FWN7GJL2ZF05HANQ/YUIGuy365yC8wRoHtOh98Q0zXWsg5QOeJgswQJmNMKaJMkOS HViQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322jDI5qVUTnM7BRU6dp+sJgz07G0pymPmg/lNZedGtD8dNkt3Q ooogwUxLYRoklFRyR4VzwS1DeTSPEbY8TyWrS9AZDg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoC1z3JtL6MSZKM37Z+hJ9gOkyYhDX8NjyL3k0KkelXNaoCYJI1thaaphUump4yFSc0VfdQguaxQHxV1KpXuc=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4d13:: with SMTP id a19mr3846871qkb.159.1603828865500; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201027025003.5A2EAF40770@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20201027025003.5A2EAF40770@rfc-editor.org>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:00:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQ0juRVhfHi5+CqyaORUmj+pgJ2=k-sTLoAAbKX4LJQyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>, Daniel McCarney <cpu@letsencrypt.org>, James Kasten <jdkasten@umich.edu>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf1cbf05b2ac818a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/NSroF_5SfcEv0YTE15O0_3Xh_AA>
Subject: Re: [Acme] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6321)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:01:09 -0000

(Submitter removed)

This appears to be invalid.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:50 PM RFC Errata System <
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555,
> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6321
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: francis raguine <7r4nki3ra9es@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 095ll210217
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>
>
> Notes
> -----
>
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. Kasten
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>