Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt

Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> Tue, 24 May 2022 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <debcooley1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8ACC14F72E for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 04:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8JilicbQ6Tz4 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2022 04:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F7AC14F72B for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2022 04:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id r12-20020a056830448c00b0060aec7b7a54so8263288otv.5 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2022 04:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fGs6vw1AmhM8uCd/tL4e8G8ejVSzGViApOpkMaOAJWE=; b=b93yey2eE79QDWSXpubwNp50V7SVqZRYUCNsCAHp6pxc76bm1+5XFsKkZ2PeiBiUhZ 6H2flZUQuhm1lrLBm/9lawo/TgqUdbTNQnFv2N1WU0X+4d6xb89JJOZ/HheyRPSHu8lb F8QQyX5kXOvLz1mJsJ0LEYsLDpYGJOupm2cBvAjTB4pVtxcaZsxF0pE/uk4BFRh/jgWO VFuq1eIUkHwBASiMJx966j0cDw9Jw8YEAu8v76IB7IaUQlWz+96lbkboHu1YAUuDWUqn aWGQwhlGnzvXeqQhxP7AFKzUZoUgkjzFe4H8lr3fTVHtNMP0B1GbA357ot8pqZnEzXUw 7iqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fGs6vw1AmhM8uCd/tL4e8G8ejVSzGViApOpkMaOAJWE=; b=y2ELR3j4ci65Q5CsuF/8TyKzAWO0fx13frqfu0mnZBgQyyqlGiSEHmemh5EXiqtweG LotJZlAozsK6ZzNUSDd6ryo5tFqRbPKzbZAuDejHpcMBJVy0AFWk+dvl4G6xN7GL/zUt CXs25w6V0lg5FFqDbPqCR5MoCk9GgtkU1SowHMIVLj/xCoRke8BilRP0cw1OrNh6RbUE SVf0fecj/zbSgx/yd9qpMF4HNgASz24xenC+T3Fso5DNATYfz+xzvkREhyyTRSlhTTbx 1Bwhvn1x2O/i9pXx7FsVvXxldEJuqlxcYgVcMSco2VMWg+sh5LXVfRiGh6eonyggwugk aR2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ommwy2dgE8p9IjwsjlqSfW+twKRNH50BEIbcSXkCds9fhrK6g VnVxiHkR5sey4VbUEnA9RAL1cnOicDz0lknDM1pAmlI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCQLMxh82RiTbHB8rqgFtdIiXIR1aKkBU5eczAdVgcIIv0sFF4ObQ4eyu/vypmH5zZ0gDv/1+52xFg9HVep+s=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:710e:0:b0:60a:f5f7:dc35 with SMTP id n14-20020a9d710e000000b0060af5f7dc35mr7054727otj.308.1653392330207; Tue, 24 May 2022 04:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164626769621.28373.14001307971144520385@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAM1+-gjWA9DYp1vuoaaQKSPHBe0ox-MWtWO3ZU7sPHsQBJeKtA@mail.gmail.com> <BN2P110MB1107FB763ED574E300071AE3DC159@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAGgd1OeLpu3AEYuYJDTk02TpqPMMSEys_QQOJC1EAyMH9O6-yg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGgd1OeLpu3AEYuYJDTk02TpqPMMSEys_QQOJC1EAyMH9O6-yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 07:38:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGgd1OdYeTXGjC-Rf+vCJbYb4u-MXEaJsXfqkdZu9+D1XGco4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>, Brian Sipos <brian.sipos+ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Dorothy E Cooley <decoole@radium.ncsc.mil>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008436f305dfc0664f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/NYiFUEUuE1lHPOUjOqElwoZg6H0>
Subject: Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 11:38:53 -0000

Did we ever get reviews on the updated draft?  If not, can we get some (or
revive the) volunteers?

Deb Cooley

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 7:12 AM Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> wrote:

> It is on the agenda.  We will ask for volunteers to review.
>
> Deb
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 5:29 PM Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>>
>> We’re past IETF LC in terms of document processing and -08 and -09 appear
>> to have changed protocol behavior.  Since there hasn’t been any discussion
>> about this on the mailing list yet, I’d like to ask the WG to review these
>> changes (
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-07&url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09).
>> Please raise any objections by Friday April 1.
>>
>>
>>
>> Helpfully, this document is on the ACME meeting agenda tomorrow at IETF
>> 113.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Acme <acme-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Brian Sipos
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2022 11:27 PM
>> *To:* IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I have posted an update to the Node ID Validation document which updates
>> references to now-published DTN RFCs (yay!) and adds algorithm agility for
>> the Key Authorization Digest to avoid the validation method being stuck on
>> SHA-256. It does add a publication dependency on the COSE hash document,
>> but that is in AUTH48 (though it's been stuck in that state for some time
>> now).
>>
>> Comments are welcome and can be discussed at the next IETF.
>>
>> Brian S.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:35 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Automated Certificate Management
>> Environment WG of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : Automated Certificate Management Environment
>> (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension
>>         Author          : Brian Sipos
>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt
>>         Pages           : 31
>>         Date            : 2022-03-02
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This document specifies an extension to the Automated Certificate
>>    Management Environment (ACME) protocol which allows an ACME server to
>>    validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID for an ACME
>>    client.  The DTN Node ID is encoded as a certificate Subject
>>    Alternative Name (SAN) of type otherName with a name form of
>>    BundleEID and as an ACME Identifier type "bundleEID".
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/
>>
>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.html
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org:
>> :internet-drafts
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> Acme@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> Acme@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>>
>