Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-caa-09: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 19 June 2019 18:32 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEC912086A; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7ezD9pQmzrr; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f41.google.com (mail-io1-f41.google.com [209.85.166.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62137120834; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f41.google.com with SMTP id r185so796790iod.6; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8Lf1cEKeH8F+H7c2WNVsYfSqd6H56EjEmL8+xrCNt1Y=; b=GxAX1S1oYWs+OjuzueNPEysWWAHb9mimuxwAXE2n59hoaPuVufsv6XjS9GamN+5ueM oPWdwzWS2/NfSHkp++9QbFPdPgbqfUVctU9OxDI1mGanN9XHYKoBWgfmMfVPlvRizsoc E2nSMi5Ul5Q3Wf9Gtev6w9FMIAc4gNY8m3ME8XbfcETTRYBadeTCd9LrlpeBXyd8oLfy BFWYKrbeQeQj6Hdgi1QfmwL3W99RQIgFlwnOFJ91I8oWEriTkvmgJdeeBSl7SkYWgZJX hRybejip25w6Qi5C/hpgfvooYxlfYqfdlJYwM9hEttSW9bP58NZof3HOLNfUcfu6OWXf hYmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbTu1XU+WiAewN5PHmHBLe4hgV4axGzF4QRLH9qM0R2rVVBLuG Bl+EDiHaZIElObsWb44UHEeNznVgXs1Bw9jqpNg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxA7j7WY4F7ipyhE8U4/ksQQM+3T2h61RKO3njBbu1+/Yb+0obh8ErhPzKpnLuFP7RrCYveW71y14xTNz6eqJQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cb96:: with SMTP id u22mr10927807jap.118.1560969166232; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156091016941.6816.6444315648910528081.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156091016941.6816.6444315648910528081.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:32:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLi+Kh=WxALBTCWJrF3GM7AFW-Fo99LG7FDOHtMuK7o3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, acme@ietf.org, Daniel McCarney <cpu@letsencrypt.org>, draft-ietf-acme-caa@ietf.org, acme-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/PCARQZR65Pjul-DCDDJA3746ZQA>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-caa-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 18:32:49 -0000
I note (and thanks for the heads-up, Ben) that there's new ABNF in Section 4 of this version. I have a DISCUSS-level question on it. The ABNF allows for the value of "validationmethods" to be empty, but the first paragraph of Section 4 says, "The value of this parameter, if specified, MUST be a comma-separated string of validation method labels," which implies that it can't be empty. Which is intended? If it's mean to be allowed to be empty, please change the text to make that clear. If not, then please remove the square-brackets on the ABNF for "value"; that will make it require at least one label. Thanks, Barry On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:10 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-acme-caa-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-caa/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for addressing my Discuss (and Comment!) points! > > While adding the discussion of the privacy considerations of publishing account URLs > suffices to clear my discuss point, I will mention that if we wanted to obscure or anonymize > the published information relating to specific account, there are pretty standard ways to > do so and I'm happy to talk about it if that's desired. > >
- [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft… Hugo Landau
- Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft… Hugo Landau
- Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Acme] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft… Hugo Landau