Re: [Acme] WG meeting at IETF 93

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Mon, 06 July 2015 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003131A886D for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 07:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XeVy-Lgk6ctf for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 07:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B771A8899 for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 07:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagc2 with SMTP id c2so156348160lag.3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 07:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b/Aa1kDu1ilqTXggGngroABXrsiEacmu6d8DD+Xm6mk=; b=HX9O7A8cqeENP+au2lj85efTgN/j0mBGKSzqmKUuU6Z6JGzmNTvrAlRLZWgGGyOFbS qSvH7jN/h3R7BSbcOaJOjKXSqFsoBueZ/A4RAhK6U1cjCOcul4KuibYdBraAPChI6eN3 86JduDJS/wprEvASSyJSryZgdIxnFi+JGkXmdrMDWkUqSJvvRJSIYmGgm7kDyljXjO8M oVRBxOfPJmCbj0drN/hRZqGCP86/sfsC2E3gkyZEMNJ0XNAkuARiPxefBXPgmlpkMQNF j6rePfGudHJfED+aW341H/at9H9jqpyR8FUfZ2q45a4wr+V+DMwUoHIqICShWWWYFPi1 u3lA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.43.202 with SMTP id y10mr48058207lal.118.1436192050576; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 07:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.203.163 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 07:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMC33P79ef0etfXOgK2ndKmdhu8VRripuQmnEbjSsq9LMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBtYC5-ExmAMcmX22C_CjwFXWJTpvCXyODxhE1QU0p-pQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMC33P79ef0etfXOgK2ndKmdhu8VRripuQmnEbjSsq9LMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 10:14:10 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 184wQi5Msb78uURsEMFtP2fuvMo
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwjd0jQL2y1T2rbWhttQmzQSd5rjSSrTodSuwg7SZm3+Pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c223d8012ca9051a358593
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/QoT9ZxensKYm-Fv-IDl1t5KCbX8>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] WG meeting at IETF 93
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 14:14:16 -0000

Another point I think should be considered on the agenda is how to use JOSE
in the spec.

I think it would be a very good idea to adopt the approach Mike Jones and
myself have been suggesting of using JOSE without base64 armoring for
authenticating requests and responses at the Web Service level.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-jose-jws-signing-input-options-00


I really hope that ACME is not going to be the last JSON based security
spec IETF does and I would really like all the specs to end up with
something approaching a uniform style.



On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Just to bump this up on people's lists, Rich and I will put up a
> preliminary agenda next Monday.  If you want time for something other than
> draft-barnes-acme, please let us know.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ted and Rich
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> As you've seen from the IESG announcement, ACME has been approved as a
>> working group, so our meeting in Prague will be as a working group rather
>> than a BoF.  The IETF agenda is still tentative, but we're currently
>> scheduled for Thursday, July 23rd, 15:20-17:20, in Karlin I/II.  (There is
>> still a chance that will change, though, so please do not tailor travel to
>> just that time frame!)
>>
>> Our charter lists draft-barnes-acme as a starting point, and Rich and I
>> are asking the authors to produce an update for the meeting.  We expect
>> some of the working group time in Prague to be a document review/discussion
>> of that draft.
>>
>> If you have other agenda items you'd like to request time for, please
>> send them to the list.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Ted and Rich
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
>