IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] change from Informational to Proposed Standard

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 18 May 2023 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB37C1516E1; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gefK3qJGjCNh; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76E4C15155B; Thu, 18 May 2023 11:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78AF38991; Thu, 18 May 2023 14:36:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Bq0QyPhvKbgT; Thu, 18 May 2023 14:36:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:40a:34ff:fe10:f571]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410203898F; Thu, 18 May 2023 14:36:22 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1684434982; bh=qJrbF7fjddPsQYb+SPF1rPhsNjNKl4Il5dHTLYeEKKk=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=kwM+Ole0F8563/wlPBUtG97ju6igCMBcllcr9pj+bB8NVt1ayYKEP4gV+0IIKtIY6 InpwQSWykPFiPr4lWFF1qkyBX7gOHqYoa7kCsEe/jBL+NiEBzZjKYFxM2j+hyxSc7E 9aUP6ipSketAB4zxuE547EwT1bV25WacGYspq0dXePg8JJu6VKAUHIoqBr9ESauyio 8LM4+D8CpTuraFa6QWqOeOqGEktfXf8/bKQOnLWvSPf9paaDjPejonudpxtNuqPSIG 6Oy8pLcLZeAvCayvV/96PGqQfrbEJrgAxldZgj9Mbr692hVqkmx2nWdC9fIoPqmlIE rwcmRF7Lcwt8A==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF72EA; Thu, 18 May 2023 14:17:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-acme-integrations@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-acme-integrations@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <66836b17428e41b5b94f6607be8bfc74@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <CAGgd1OdJv10Dyo0Lk9KepaOffHLJJnd__5ztPhm9cAMg194N0A@mail.gmail.com> <ZEQilv1wufLpYw8z@kduck.mit.edu> <20267.1682200595@localhost> <ZESCuvyTm9kzVBbV@kduck.mit.edu> <CAGgd1OerL--yLE_hfoPkOyWMmXqwf1m=eGp-=xQF10NachEyvw@mail.gmail.com> <66836b17428e41b5b94f6607be8bfc74@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 14:17:05 -0400
Message-ID: <661.1684433825@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/QytOTSmYdaHdeK5FpQC83JU5gmQ>
Subject: Re: [Acme] change from Informational to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 18:17:13 -0000

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote:
    > On process: if this document will be published as Proposed Standard, it
    > will need to be taken out of IESG Evaluation, confirmed in the WG
    > (done), sent for a second IETF LC, and returned for another IETF
    > review.

    > Please let me know if the upcoming -14 will be the right version to
    > re-run the steps.

Hi, yes, -14 just posted, and I think it's ready for those steps.
Three changes: 1) Rifaat has changed affliation, 2) Pledge: defined, 3)
Status changes to standards track.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email