Re: [Acme] Exposed rate limits

Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Mon, 21 March 2016 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA0C12D509 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbKYTO9Hlk5r for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEF9412D1ED for <acme@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=eCSgrS3io06sJ1dy5+1sXGCCl7TmbXJ5n5Z8sVnLSZ4=; b=Ao8Fymi7T6dUDMZHIDdsxu9NQtheHT9acbzsS1hhfQV11SWtQef159mnDsVxmajtfYCWXUbKDjXuuufRRIRfVenS7S8t/AYtt/y3vYv5Sww0svzLSLri1IRSX0b4d5vOAcgvUnNtOjRL2aLMC5vi3lHrqyBGnu5jkyc/U86IYaY=;
Received: ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:54:58 -0700
To: Philipp Junghannß <teamhydro55555@gmail.com>
References: <CANUQDCijf0WSkQ=T9qB+NEjm22897EN2jaOmvAip6aTt_yRhcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACHSkNrwDDPtpxwr=CC5stkPCTGHqFD1inkr44usaG=gL2ZqWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANUQDCgpMNjcg30y6uA2aFaMXa8XSA8py=7tbp34L1gnO2eKhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAObDDPBkAZEeSsM4YpKarUVYfksheq0Y9cio=OpJyu9TMBDrog@mail.gmail.com> <CANUQDCjL5H68GZDwWraRXhn+OoBtvWdp03iRtsbWHNrW+cz--w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwii96cXn==-qK5ynCP=cOotwDusAb36iq_DOjV6L765GA@mail.gmail.com> <56F07F85.9070906@eff.org> <CACHSkNoRp8zZ0nWaPPcdbEL4wLZpxVf_a4cvphKdG34Gviiw1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <56F089D2.5090905@eff.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:54:58 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACHSkNoRp8zZ0nWaPPcdbEL4wLZpxVf_a4cvphKdG34Gviiw1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: skipped for local relay
Received-SPF: skipped for local relay
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/S8r5m9-Mh6gbE4vmzkF1CKVhFC4>
Cc: "J.C. Jones" <jjones@mozilla.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Exposed rate limits
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 23:55:08 -0000

[off-topic a bit]

On 03/21/2016 04:22 PM, Philipp Junghannß wrote:
> wait a sec you *do* have overrides for LE? it was iirc stated often
> enough that nothing can be done about rate limits...
We don't do one-off fixes for folks who have exceeded a weekly rate
limit, but for hosting providers that are doing a large integration, we
have a request process. We process these on a very sporadic basis, so
it's only a useful solution for long-term integrations.