Re: [Acme] ACME resources relations
Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Fri, 03 February 2017 19:36 UTC
Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D414C12948C for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:36:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eff.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hCOxneytaV_X for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3081D12940B for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:36:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=bXZH/noqbHGqkvAe2ipUtvNyoVFTmquhkM+sYhcPJGw=; b=MuCP/1zFojJCz/8KIxRBxXLO4BDT9bcz8OJB7aEgrW5wCp76VOz19bPuFcvYgYyblMv2jrOUnMs8xdFcPappnwgWwAdeTMjLOpqILYNqKRFFSl/paqRulfTbnrW7MQZ16LUGQRD7dXU8cWu772rk3so8Jsm3BvgVYYK+SgMC0Lo=;
Received: ; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 11:36:38 -0800
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Andriy Mahats <Andriy.Mahats@buypass.no>
References: <1bfcd722703f4236a32fc7458084ff06@Buyp-gvk-ex01.intra.buypass.no> <CAL02cgQjbMvRVAVGLzrJde1OOdjH74gPgT-ctzeX42e7-5-w3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Message-ID: <7bd34325-ed2b-b43a-a8b5-29ac7a960d2e@eff.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 11:36:36 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgQjbMvRVAVGLzrJde1OOdjH74gPgT-ctzeX42e7-5-w3A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: skipped for local relay
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/S9rLc-LC9Te_DdPkJ_H85E2p-aE>
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] ACME resources relations
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 19:36:41 -0000
On 02/03/2017 10:46 AM, Richard Barnes wrote: > This is a good question, and I'm not sure what the right answer is. > It seems like there are basically three options: > > 1. Remove the "up" relation > 2. Have the "up" relation point to the order that created the authz > (if any) > 3. Have multiple "up" relations pointing to all relevant orders > > Of those options, I would probably prefer (1), just because I don't > really see much of a use case for it. I concur. I'd actually like to do a thorough review of the various link relations and remove the unnecessary ones, but saving that for WGLC.
- [Acme] ACME resources relations Andriy Mahats
- Re: [Acme] ACME resources relations Richard Barnes
- Re: [Acme] ACME resources relations Jacob Hoffman-Andrews