Return-Path: X-Original-To: acme@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: acme@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7BAEDA5F27; Wed, 13 May 2026 02:28:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778664498; bh=EMuaWFKTTInvYIYAl/n/ehBkD3NseuMcuBJFSyQCFE8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=S7/P+MIWK0q8RM4ssybz0pbZmwOJLnP04aOs3xIwIEEdCVK2QmYQ7qRuOo6HcqGUH eQIf8+8LMDQR4RnLB10GDLAYMCahX8BU9UGuY8qKkHJ3K0mg9/qlMHS/FWLN98ff0I lq1U6INzPaUczKrSFdMphWomXwHuvpG9yNAgMJ9s= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=daknob.net Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yzf6i0UyS9RD; Wed, 13 May 2026 02:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dione.s.daknob.net (dione.s.daknob.net [159.100.255.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78570EDA5D7F; Wed, 13 May 2026 02:26:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=daknob.net; s=dione0; t=1778664364; bh=EMuaWFKTTInvYIYAl/n/ehBkD3NseuMcuBJFSyQCFE8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=HjFdkKSQnj6ugSmcUe1KrTjtq9DQXAZth1lxdhlPJxT89/pRrmb0G2xgNZFzgVx+o q8IKc7+eRM4lBBLhUIQTKQhzDcLpM1B3F727tkaooUpI0TAAIoytms1xZhLtNDDRfm I1r4dQAtgV6oqZ/+x/1fPcmSf6Dm/NSg9IMqtAkvXLCWKRpzUjJ1TkJGCaLuGx0Tp1 p+HetVecu7dWyqfRXvHYqy1NTA/VGqd7EX4OrkTWYELPY5nIeOW3RM+i+xWqo4Phq9 LzQJzTbAcmn7ZFCWE0KSSMGu6KMXF2V51qk0K29P8oObYRoapwVijFD1AWRUVunlu9 BWzbFTb2JsATQ== Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a0d:3dc0:200:0:8409:99ad:69f2:fbc8]) by dione.s.daknob.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BDFD86A27; Wed, 13 May 2026 09:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.500.181\)) From: Antonis Chariton In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 11:25:49 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <78B9C32C-BBF2-4447-906C-114FE982E529@daknob.net> References: To: Mike Ounsworth X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.500.181) Message-ID-Hash: EKUPBYX6IK22HBAOZ3JFGAFZ4AQWDGPK X-Message-ID-Hash: EKUPBYX6IK22HBAOZ3JFGAFZ4AQWDGPK X-MailFrom: daknob@daknob.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-acme.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label@ietf.org, IETF ACME X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BAcme=5D_Re=3A_Status_of_draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label_=3F?= List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hello Mike, Here=E2=80=99s the current status as far as I'm aware of: - We have incorporated all of this feedback and finished that process a = few years ago - The current spec has been added to the CA/B Forum BRs and issuance by = publicly trusted CAs is allowed with the text as-is - At least 3 CAs that I know of have deployed this - There are at least 2 different interoperable implementations on the = server side - There are at least 3 different interoperable implementations on the = client side We have asked for this to proceed once, but it didn=E2=80=99t go into a = vote. I will be at IETF in Vienna, but at this point I am not sure what else = is required from us. This is already being used for certificates by CAs = for years, and it seems to have been stuck in IETF for a while. Any help appreciated to move this forward by anyone on this list would = be appreciated. Thanks, Antonis > On 12 May 2026, at 14:47, Mike Ounsworth = wrote: >=20 > Hi authors of draft-ietf-acme-dns-account-label, >=20 > I notice that the draft is due to expire within the week. Could you = please give a status update on this draft? Are there active deployments? = Are there open issues and active work being done on the document? >=20 > -Mike Ounsworth > ACME Co-Chair