Re: [Acme] High level comments on draft-barnes-acme (the GitHub version)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 25 March 2015 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F421A8A1E for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1jNbxFi21C5 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2911A8BC4 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CFD28500; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:25:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com [172.17.120.126]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11109284FD; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:25:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ecp.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A87B2026; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:25:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:25:15 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.102]) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.102]) with mapi id 15.00.0913.011; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:25:14 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>, John Mattsson <john.mattsson@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] High level comments on draft-barnes-acme (the GitHub version)
Thread-Index: AQHQZxmk1M68c5H69UWO2PH8xj5dVZ0txrqAgAAVw4CAACrCgP//v48Q
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:25:14 +0000
Message-ID: <f4f8e8ed2e5e462da7943c807f880b09@usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <92B826AA-48E3-454C-85A9-600F84D539DD@ericsson.com> <9F77199A-98B7-4963-8EA3-552405B5342F@titanous.com> <B4953448-093A-4DB7-B81D-B09FE31E7B3F@ericsson.com> <CABtrr-V4++ayD4UV32maWiOSLyg=r3Gj-HNnDaizQ_WoF_4PjQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABtrr-V4++ayD4UV32maWiOSLyg=r3Gj-HNnDaizQ_WoF_4PjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.19.112.203]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/XJX-ipY6f8IWegbtGnJC4Y3yxHA>
Cc: Jonathan Rudenberg <jonathan@titanous.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] High level comments on draft-barnes-acme (the GitHub version)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:25:23 -0000

> This seems like a big deal, no? That is, since SNI is one of the few things not
> protected in the TLS handshake, it does seem spoofable. If there's not
> something I'm missing, it seems like the proposal should just drop DVSNI
> altogether.

The SNI is protected (part of the message final MAC's) but it is not encrypted.