IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Meeting in Prague?

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Tue, 15 January 2019 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8512D130DCB for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fykZAZ0Epavn for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x334.google.com (mail-ot1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465F4130E72 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x334.google.com with SMTP id w25so3186467otm.13 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+vQ32rHABN33ipv9pEDkjpYzFKBA5u1i0ADPm/cOpcY=; b=AHCEO2j2Y37FGmpD0GFysXuXXWeyXNPNZ0l+jdpzj9ydQztk7W/USLUJtBhGBfFzYE TsITPxT30YOSKjBWttsVPrl7qFf+S6w+Dseje2X4W1SINHt66ROvD3z2lvly9etvnVo3 1C/VJYs53bXIQlknK/hUDIfVyn9xU6NxCyLr5c2rLb5AN0u5mQOy19FkTux5P9IeZHIv 0zaD9RdSc4twpp+2OzqNCtyeF6sxcGjfm7fo7dNBykp2IuTawWq8BJpV0EntqqFXhLmM WVhLFyPBKOqOwdmcSi4v0PLBmUOfNJq/PxAf2BTWBIWOY0+1KYRTPTLbgS2y2C0nkZ4c o/pQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+vQ32rHABN33ipv9pEDkjpYzFKBA5u1i0ADPm/cOpcY=; b=pJZPLLjTyflxZGi88nESFAO+IP/81Alt6d+4UExYhXIVwvHJ+HHOAIaxZhHcvlZ3An 3E2BrNkw+sZkgqcwRwe5tVx7dhxvOik+QnUV9FMq0ZqVKe3HUoShzpbx5P8ekpPqs0DW Z5/0YMoMF2dYO1oCcydOZuCu1guV3sPiegYM3L+azRZq8FNox0bcdsbmTyJif7LqZAEl LbefGIJSRkNbIFWBMiijT411UQ9qs7jwk0vSQU5USareza7GFeIFNopZddfJUht2+7nj mi8O5iV+3D19/Tcxg+HHtrBlCTQ6dFgtUJh30yJc+M/Ynr/+Cv1W4gRJEBXFA9eG+iGj ejUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfSivhvvz7KBQP+3+/nWp5m2X/w0yJhd1uyxKxw47lzbQuU2au/ k7geuCMoJFQrS7BuBocJ2shcHXoZkne9qFhGI5vBAy7n
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5U5Hq3giTbFm1hOtGzgZcj5EynknAkcrWukye1a9bKkeuJZsKfNPe7sDECHMOxX1ysGHLp2uYZ7+ZhppmepS0=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3a22:: with SMTP id j31mr3065885otc.238.1547573439502; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <41F1BDD5-AD1F-41BD-96FA-CF73DF4DE526@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <41F1BDD5-AD1F-41BD-96FA-CF73DF4DE526@akamai.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:07 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTwGx_5qdweFXdrrt3RqWt7Z6hQJ_gqTuRPZXWXa5qUAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000203344057f82851b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/ZeZw7gFBd6BT2sBpIHXqjEHLuZA>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Meeting in Prague?
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:30:43 -0000

I hold out hope that we can have the WG closed by Prague.  If we haven't,
and the collaborators on the phone stuff need to meet, that seems like it
can be handled as a side meeting.

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:09 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> Should we meet in Prague?
>
>
>
> Most of our documents are in last-call or on the verge, and the other is
> the phone stuff which has a small group of collaborators who are working
> well together.
>
>
>
> Am quite happy to meet if the WG thinks it is worthwhile.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email