IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Want client-defined callback port

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 22 April 2015 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5BC1A914F for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 04:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pM-e_elo6r_M for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 04:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com [96.6.114.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5C01A913D for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 04:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7510B1658F2; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:26:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay08.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay08.akamai.com [172.27.22.71]) by prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A32D1657D5; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:26:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay08.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522889803E; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:26:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:26:08 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.102]) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.102]) with mapi id 15.00.0913.011; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:26:08 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Bruce Gaya <gaya@apple.com>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] Want client-defined callback port
Thread-Index: AQHQeJFWLa11+CsrFEy/G1KlsESTHZ1QpJ+AgAAQ9QCAAA7+AIAAm+aAgAbzyAD//+//8IAAXK2AgABLlRA=
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:26:07 +0000
Message-ID: <4a0c4f17ea8c4adb8bff5ea925a99c7b@usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <352DA5FE-AC6F-49A7-8F9F-70A74889204F@apple.com> <CAK3OfOjey4bk02qC_jj2c0AzZ54qnP=KAJnG=mXnO6A5gZ4m9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQ94ijVrCM9SStcodRW+XSG2w5Zwu3+ny8HriDBnxjdtg@mail.gmail.com> <FF21526F-BA8D-4F54-AAE3-047632706668@apple.com> <CAL02cgSDk0TNYusEkXA3onmqF7=kaAWhHjpW8WjbiqxgQMdQwQ@mail.gmail.com> <555F6C74-2416-4893-BDEA-A3C2E55A6D57@apple.com> <16985cf1c8c444c48d328fa766ec5ff8@usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com> <DE264105-7317-4343-BCEE-539A73D42544@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <DE264105-7317-4343-BCEE-539A73D42544@apple.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.19.57.223]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/ZpfG9Hqi1N7rBkxEWZWVOM_fyE4>
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Want client-defined callback port
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:26:13 -0000

> The policy of Let’s Encrypt Certificate Authority, however, is very important!   I also would very much like that CA to allow client-defined callback ports below 1024.

While many LE folks are on this list, you'll need to take that up with them over on some other forum.   To bring back an old phrase, this list is about mechanism, not policy. 

	/r$

--  
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email