Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme

Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Wed, 12 August 2015 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360411AC41B for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBv_-pbZBN7h for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DF91AC419 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oio137 with SMTP id 137so14380943oio.0 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=c3qWXwm9f6T3m84ekIPWgcdiYCavUVSl2BLK6LkyxBg=; b=Yd6ut9fz0XKs1zL6pb46B1BxoKflomQ9Oq1+E8XWB18sb0r72ttI33r7TFS2cNiUMh DpkkZqhNTCkle0OBpirivJrlASC66b/b1/JRQz0dfvsdnSfgk5Xxg5ZcZs03Xy6L96sX Q4OL/1YZeoHEC8g5R9ZFnR3g3kKQX6dOSVRVX/PQmQ0sPBmFttNMzY3t6B0qmlkF70is WLnaCewC9AqbG9WHwo2d22Mig24NeUnfRJ8J+rdSD+3WgvZr1UF6fn5+NSYrjrl5z4C4 fClOurGIsvLZ6Auj0he0sAeeJTdHYQaTIe7zXzwamcPryC8f/5DiTMy5h8qIRoasN/jE FPMA==
X-Received: by 10.202.210.215 with SMTP id j206mr29995907oig.68.1439405720296; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.159.227 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCNO1uvErj8U_nz9eZt42Ub27Jt4sfJrYO3zUUBjv5ysg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMAF4r_oj31gz6u9mQPSLrrPxS-e2Fpwj0mFJR=qa1xkgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVLuO_Qa+psGk7r0nxd6Fj-Rx=ho2H0Lp_wrsTkeiYGeeg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXSi623tNMTcWXFeGm48bbJTPG_3Epi_kKxUYBppAfc3g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVKi=+zQvno+LNmJD=1=vYO3N-8_+GOeJLdgeqi+XJ5wbg@mail.gmail.com> <55CB8EFF.8060806@eff.org> <CA+9kkMCNO1uvErj8U_nz9eZt42Ub27Jt4sfJrYO3zUUBjv5ysg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:55:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVJSvu2XvTcK+pDhE9ubLSi=vS7gpbcP7fhqdi11p6XS+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d2994a5635e051d21c2ee"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/_OINoB1XD8-DwUZRUZqeqyFz2Gw>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:55:22 -0000

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> ​So, this is a common misconception.  Adopting a draft doesn't mean you
> think it is done or even that it has no known issues; it's a statement by
> the working group that this is a starting point.  ​Think of it like picking
> a github repo to work from--you want concrete text to present diffs to, and
> picking a draft to work from lets you do that.   I believe the group so far
> believes that the diffs should be against draft-barnes; that's all this
> means.
>

All right, my apologies then. I don't have other concerns.

-- 
Tony Arcieri