IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Terms of service agreement changes

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 17 August 2016 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C504D12D8AF for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EGlqeMkrzC9r for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x229.google.com (mail-yw0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E501812D0A0 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u134so64320933ywg.3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TsA+35e2iPa9GC1/o64AxgirCzoyxmD7VHxKAgA0Lik=; b=M4JqZjF+fF3C/9uVveOQBlx6pO7CrmEjHjwOtG44LmCmOkDNRPDW4CUo9pbIrf8Y5J 8weSd0tuxQs4Wt17jaR1bbj3F8hTP8zS801TfizNcg+f+6X4uAvC1IHm/TGuhfls/haq WYLziPRH6zvh58+KtyCnw06IgCRxSsO+Nj3pVf6gnzjuilrGPvX0DkYwOy5kUEjw/scH Za5JvJ4zlwJDXHUiSh7yX0W3+LYBNtKQeSD1LgvWtXPg1oGQvirfMJxnCagN8rbplrRs MgbFnmd/LrN9mK8/fdWViSvary/EAy4XkSTe3emeEAQBCP+5o9Z9hUCxkx/Plq6HAqEC uqeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TsA+35e2iPa9GC1/o64AxgirCzoyxmD7VHxKAgA0Lik=; b=BdWNa4VYeIKvVfXQEJBkRTrWR0DVl3Gn8Cx2zSTLybZpEGdVTHXjDqw0Gytwp69SFp GWDyHv8+83agZALlbODPoDLFfHDvX3M6Dl+VTs2DaPPfCK6ohtN8gSjmbf3yUPYuSVMl ogg7t4qFQ/oMAa+EF19iR9EPbliCJr4DcGC8+x8Zuj5qzwVjK7ilMCuERIjJQ54KLyjZ NtleZn5VNq8xLYYcbrV9FHYcmGE6WKUOAjmY+RUE3o0ZCa+bzrKCijAWjw7uHgi+VjQI 1P3G8Xp+zon0yP7IBjTKtbI4g8eDFeJn6jRcalJOq8GY2a0hprurSTI/q6jwCZkYOiB3 4pcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv9WMLWD84hHqNtk67KRU3q1c0InqQwJvRC6osLNkr9vfM3Zrntu2w2ndx6CT1IIZ2I8SoH56r+0ReSzg==
X-Received: by 10.13.221.198 with SMTP id g189mr27197131ywe.93.1471456061227; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.48.193 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <575599a0-20e8-1bb1-b21a-26cf1c39d251@eff.org>
References: <627b7240-a9db-7259-6d38-1bad24f80856@eff.org> <20160807123428.GA10284@andover.lhh.devever.net> <CAL02cgQZucvbNCmiTk5Vkn1D3V7VH3F0m5NtXX9GdqznPMtgLw@mail.gmail.com> <CANUQDChYC6zF0VHZ5LcdSxjsc8t6C36hRJx_b8JUUOUVbn8huA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRHwOHGgLeZLOeEDx3K0EwtfokYkcja4adq3xw0xAj5CQ@mail.gmail.com> <02d7023e-98f6-bd87-f35d-65fb44e62098@eff.org> <20160809194229.GI8744@hex.shelbyville.oz> <801db366-377f-ea94-6b6b-7dd8e2f0c108@eff.org> <cf5a59f2-e8f4-1324-29e7-3977db34f2a2@eff.org> <CABcZeBNZMMxQ6MH_XBPDO2qHHL=MJwGTgzj68sjFNR+m7ik86A@mail.gmail.com> <65fd7564-dda8-883a-662a-21b23f46eb11@eff.org> <CABcZeBO0iAmn0eMROGvwjL3W2ff0LRj0NOHiZSu2_tri-cvA0A@mail.gmail.com> <79122325-9d27-0cae-8858-4efafeee8360@eff.org> <CABcZeBNDnkBwxVHHwVperc-0=O5nJDc1Ute9VnDMedq+HZJTrg@mail.gmail.com> <575599a0-20e8-1bb1-b21a-26cf1c39d251@eff.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:47:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMSqNjEbDFtk1VEm7oz0UoW4TA_aXYJLEY+Zn7eqdtVOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0779ced55d7a053a480fbd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/bHWJTG1efm5MZomyye1SNSAoUto>
Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Terms of service agreement changes
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:47:48 -0000

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
wrote:

> On 08/17/2016 10:11 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >     Can you tell me more about what you find confusing? Is it just the
> MUST?
> >
> > The whole text.
> >     If so, I'm happy to change it to a SHOULD, with the understanding
> that
> >     the server is likely to reject such requests.
> >
> >
> > Again, I'd like to step back from the text a bit. It's not a matter of
> > MUST versus SHOULD
> > but about what behavior on the part of the client would be needed to be
> > compliant. For
> > instance, can it send this PDU without ever prompting the user for
> consent.
>
> Can you propose an alternate text? My intent is not to alter the current
> state of things with regards to user consent, but merely to simplify the
> protocol. What is the text that, for you, would indicate the exact same
> things about user consent as the current draft?


I don't think the current text is very clear, so I think if we're going to
not change
that we should keep the text as-is while we discuss what it ought to say.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email