[Acme] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-star-09: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-acme-star-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-star/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. While I am balloting "no
objection", I support Alexey's DISCUSS.

I am also wondering what is the impact of the increased rate of request to the
ACME server. While sections 4 and 5 answered most of the questions popping up
in my mind when reading the document; I am still concerned that going from a 90
days to a 3 days validity is probably multiplying the load by 30 on ACME
server, are the free existing ACME server ready to continue their free services?

Regards,

-éric