IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Acme] Re: [EXT] Re: Two-week confirmation of the DTN Node ID draft

"Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu> Wed, 16 April 2025 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>
X-Original-To: acme@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: acme@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE261D29517 for <acme@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jhuapl.edu
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UX0vGvbDMmlO for <acme@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aplegw03.jhuapl.edu (aplegw03.jhuapl.edu [128.244.208.131]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39291D2950D for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (aplegw03.jhuapl.edu [127.0.0.1]) by aplegw03.jhuapl.edu (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 53GH2968251652; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:11:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhuapl.edu; h=content-type : date : from : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : references : subject : to; s=JHUAPL2024; bh=Dt2Q2vCcylA3BWeApk/jYFmGmPDUBOX9glDDBdsohQ0=; b=Fml0w3qyf9+Jn3lEQVuIVpnREXyEDtACPJ8Chko/f4mimjZc/ct+ekWiHnqEZjekFOVC cF7ASXfYpQQ9A+Vxc3cDx0fAP/9NRPmajhzgoeK9c98rSDfxjZZw0VP/CJRRSAnELW1G SxrtsDrgnsI5BipkHRxEokGIJc/exrwB1ajgLN3G9YVfJm3pl3EVhPuL6InlDdMz+IGI HQMNRB1sjMy7z8rqSLLZKwbtz/B2RGUuydVLAf6dwacVKgiY6FK0z5uAQq6XaTSuBsvq /+F0T2RdbcYCo8G9qlgVwbPTKIjEe7JvPY1xwrmcXLoLb2uHjXg24nS0QXtmzpdSJ5z4 kw==
Received: from aplex23.dom1.jhuapl.edu (aplex23.dom1.jhuapl.edu [10.114.162.8]) by aplegw03.jhuapl.edu (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4606batv3m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:11:13 -0400
Received: from APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.6) by APLEX23.dom1.jhuapl.edu (10.114.162.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.10; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:11:13 -0400
Received: from APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::20d7:9545:f01e:9b2]) by APLEX21.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::20d7:9545:f01e:9b2%5]) with mapi id 15.02.1748.010; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:11:13 -0400
From: "Sipos, Brian J." <Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXT] [Acme] Re: Two-week confirmation of the DTN Node ID draft
Thread-Index: AQHbqlFpEb82tb+t3UecWN9r8zUnI7OmR0Bw
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:11:12 +0000
Message-ID: <5fe5d2073ab24b00aaf4af7b4c861e4b@jhuapl.edu>
References: <3AA94E5F-39C2-4D7D-9D14-61D64DB65420@gmail.com> <421547D9-FB00-4B47-957E-B46129A8064F@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <421547D9-FB00-4B47-957E-B46129A8064F@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.162.18]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003F_01DBAED1.067F1030"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: APLEX23.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: APLEX23.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1095,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-04-16_06,2025-04-15_01,2024-11-22_01
Message-ID-Hash: G6HZBYN3OKHRHP2MFOI4CPX5LAFDR6ZL
X-Message-ID-Hash: G6HZBYN3OKHRHP2MFOI4CPX5LAFDR6ZL
X-MailFrom: Brian.Sipos@jhuapl.edu
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-acme.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Acme] Re: [EXT] Re: Two-week confirmation of the DTN Node ID draft
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/ebSv7PWBx4foetmgugxKMkMsTb8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:acme-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:acme-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:acme-leave@ietf.org>

Chairs, as document author I also support its continued progress. I believe it still represents an interoperable, experimental ACME validation method.

 

Brian S.

 

From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2025 3:47 PM
To: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXT] [Acme] Re: Two-week confirmation of the DTN Node ID draft

 


APL external email warning: Verify sender forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org <mailto:forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org>  before clicking links or attachments

 

A reminder.

 

So far, we’ve had but one response. We’d like to see more.

 





On 2 Apr 2025, at 7:44, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:ynir.ietf@gmail.com> > wrote:

 

Hi, folks

 

As we said at the meeting, the DTN Node ID draft can now progress, now that RFC 9713 has been published.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/

 

This WG approved the document in 2021, followed by an IETF LC and IESG processing. Because so much time has elapsed, we’d like to poll the group to see that this document still represents the WG consensus.

 

Please re-read this, and reply to this thread.  Is this still a good idea.

 

Please respond by EOD 16-April-2025.

 

Regards,

 

Tomofumi & Yoav

ACME chairs

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status